I saw this email (click twice to enlarge) on the Max Powers web site:
The email is a response from the city manager to a city representative’s earlier note.
I don’t think the city representative meant to have the city manager listen to the cold. That would be hard to do. I suspect that the representative meant to write “here” instead of “hear” in the subject line.
Freud or Machiavelli?
The city manager was thanking the representative for her work. The manager wrote:
“You are very thoughtful and deliberative, even though you always consider the constituent bases affected.”
Does considering the constituent’s make it harder to be thoughtful and deliberative? Are the interests of the constituents not worthy of consideration by a city official?
Is the city representative somehow wrong for considering the constituents?
I guess governing is simpler when you only consider what you want.
We deserve better
Brutus
elpasospeak 
Acosta’s consideration of her constituents needs could why she is considered by certain people to be stupid, whiny, and obstinate. Oh, and I forgot “crazy”, What could she possibly be thinking?
LikeLike
It’s like I’ve been saying all along: the problem with El Paso is that it’s too…..El Paso-ish. But seriously, (yeah, right) it must be so cold where Emma works that she LITERALLY had a brain freeze. The solution is obvious – BLANKET DRIVE! I’ll get this charity drive started by donating my ‘Six Million Dollar Man’ blanket that I haven’t used in centuries. BTW – I’m sure Emma has a bright political future ahead of her now that she’s admitted that her work is sometimes insuffient and unsatisfactory. Oh noooo!!! I’m not being facetious!
(snicker snicker)
LikeLike