The other day city council decided unanimously to not increase the impact fees that the city charges when new buildings are built.
Some members of council expressed their opinion that raising the cost of a piece of land in the city causes people to build outside of the city limits. We then essentially lose the property tax revenue even as those new county residents come into the city and use our facilities.
I can’t take a side on the issue, I simply don’t know enough about it.
The Times wrote an article about the vote and included a quote from the head of our water utility:
“We are OK with the 12-month delay,” Balliew said.
One of the driving forces behind the proposal to increase impact fees is the need to do a $43 million expansion of the Jonathan Rogers Water Treatment Plant over the next five years. Balliew said the utility will seek state money for the project from various sources including Proposition 6, which was passed by the voters last November and set aside $2 billion of “rainy-day funds” for water and sewer projects around the state.
Another double whammy?
State funds are available yet they wanted to roughly double our current impact fees.
I mentioned the situation to a few citizens and their responses were remarkably quick and similar. In essence they said “Sure, that way they get an increase in local fees and can get state money to pay for the expansion too. You don’t think the fee will be reduced once the project is paid for, do you?”
We deserve better
Brutus
elpasospeak 
Please explain why people elsewhere in Texas should pay the cost of supplying water to the eastward sprawl of El Paso.
LikeLike
And let’s also not forget the amount they skim off of your water bill each month for future growth along with the all the land they bought to one day sell off for future growth and the $40 million in unspent bonds they took out for future growth.
The city was looking to make this more than a triple or quadruple dip situation.
LikeLike
So says the guy who was all for the “Stormwater Utility” and said the PSB didn’t buy Volvos. All of sudden your against the PSB because of impact fees ? I don’t think they are needed either, but its all about Mom’s business with your critiques.
LikeLike