Power struggle not necessary

We should soon be involved in the discussion about what form of government we want the city to take.

The mayor has told us that he will put the issue to the voters as soon as it is legal for us to consider it in an election again.  That should be in May of 2015.

For most of our history we have operated with what is called the “strong mayor” form.  The mayor was the chief executive of the city and had direct control over the departments.  City council could reign in the mayor in but it took a majority of the city representatives to agree.

There was a time where each city representative was given responsibility for the operation of some departments.  That went away in the 1980’s at the same time that we ended up with single member districts.  Prior to that our aldermen, as they were known then, ran as a slate and the voters essentially picked a team to place on city council.

In the 1980’s we created the position of “chief administrative officer” (CAO).  This person did most of the management of the city departments following instructions from the mayor unless city council put its foot down in which case the chief administrative officer implemented the express wishes of council.  It took a majority vote of city council to fire the chief administrative officer, thus the mayor did not have complete control.

Before our recent switch to the “city manager” form of government the mayor and the city representatives were elected for two year terms.  The mayor and council had to face the voters every two years and if the voters were not happy with the course the city had taken we got new elected officials.

The chief administrative officer’s job was to implement the policies handed down to him by the mayor and council.  The CAO was not supposed to be an activist.  He could not dream up new schemes and fool council into following them.

City manager

Under our city manager form of government we have witnessed several years where initiative was the domain of the city manager.  We saw city representatives trying to work with the city manager without the knowledge necessary to manage her.  The manager and city staff frequently misled council.  We did not have a strong executive or legislative body to keep her in check.

Our new city manager is displaying signs that he will be far more reasonable.  He has openly spoken about how in “El Paso” our wants somehow become “needs” even though we do not have a way to pay for all of them.  He may turn out to be the kind of manager we need.

This is not either/or

There has been talk that the new city manager will be out of a job if the voters return us to the strong mayor form.  That does not have to be the case.

If the voters do make the change, city council and the mayor could decide to ask the city manager to become the chief administrative officer.  If we change the term of office for city council and the mayor back to two years from the current four we could have a situation where we have a professional manager implementing our elected leader’s policies with the voters having a reasonably frequent opportunity to agree or disagree with what is being done.

Local government

There has been much talk about the advantages of having four year terms.  The proponents point to our national government where senators sit for six  years and our president for four.  They ignore the fact that our house representatives sit for two years.

In fact during the convention that led to our constitution there were several delegates that wanted the house terms to be less that two years.  One year was a common choice, but some wanted terms as short as a few months.  Their thinking was that the representatives would represent their districts more faithfully if they knew that they would be held accountable before time diminished the memories of the voters.

Both the strong mayor and the city manager form of government can be made to work.

What is important here is that the voters take an active part in the discussion and the vote.

We deserve better


8 Responses to Power struggle not necessary

  1. Nostalgia – never a good way to make decisions because the good times are exaggerated and the bad times are nearly forgotten. There’s a reason city government was changed – it didn’t work. That a City Manager was hired that you didn’t like wasn’t her fault, just like Tommy, the a-hole that he is, is not to blame – that is directly on Council, who the fair citizens of this city put in office (by the by, that this Council hired this guy is indictment enough for me that we need to get rid of everyone).

    I find it ironic that the deficit hawks on this blog think the City Manager is doing a good job – the support bloc he’s building on Council is comprised of the very Council representatives that people here love to hate. Remember that when the luster has worn off and you realize the platitudes he’s flinging your way are just to keep you nice and compliant.

    Long lost in El Paso – but always just a keyboard away


  2. U says:

    1. We already have term limits. They are called elections.

    2. Any city rep or mayor can be recalled.

    3. The city manager can be fired at any time with only 5 votes out of 9. The citizens have control but they just have to get off the couch and exercise their Rights.

    *itching and moaning on a blog is a waste ofr time. If you want something done get off your backside and get in the game or just shut up.


    • Helen Marshall says:

      Term limits mean that no matter how well the representative is doing, s/he cannot run again…which in one sense deprives the voters of the candidate that they might actually prefer. In another sense it enables a lazy rep to do nothing in the final term, knowing that the voters cannot express their views about his or her performance.

      Regarding “get in the game or just shut up.” I’ve created petitions, signed petitions, written to the mayor and my rep (no reply), met with my representative, and participated in demonstrations. None of this seems to matter very much. A blog like this provides opportunities to learn about what is happening and take some of the above actions. If enough of us do it, maybe it will matter someday.


  3. Haiduc says:

    I say we need responsible local city/ county government…a city/county manager keeps the staffers in line and only the voters can control who we elect…Who is elect is the problem!


  4. Jerry Kurtyka says:

    I don’t know who dreamed up the debt and spending binge, Wilson or the CC. But I know who is going to pay for it.


  5. I say (and have been saying this for a while now), we need to take a few steps back. We do NOT need a City Manager. We do need a strong Mayor, backed by a strong Council. Shorter terms make sense, because that might provide us, the taxpayers/voters with at least the illusion that we still have some say in how OUR City is run. The current system, going back to the disastrous singing Mayor, has only hurt us, and now we’re looking at the results of too many years of nothing being done to maintain our streets, we’ve lost our once beautiful City Plaza, we no longer have a City Hall, and we are no better off than we were.


    • elrichiboy says:

      When terms were two years, the City Representatives would loot the treasury and then be gone by the time the taxpayers figured it out.

      Our representatives may not be better now, but at least they’re still around for us to complain about.

      Or at least they wait until they’ve termed out, or their ten year contract has run out, to fleece us.


      • Helen Marshall says:

        Term limits sound appealing, but the main consequence is that in the “end term” the rep does not have to worry at all, if so inclined, as regardless of how poorly or corruptly s/he may be, there is no opportunity for the voters to express their vews.


Leave a Reply -- you do not have to enter your email address

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: