City fears they are wrong published this article the other day.

Mr. Max Grossman wrote the article.  He is a plaintiff in a proceeding  that is being heard in Austin that deals with the arena issue.  He wrote:

The City’s original petition for declaratory judgment makes it clear that they were expecting a challenge to the arena location.  Actually, my team is arguing, contrary to what is stated in the first sentence of the El Paso Times report, that the City’s expenditure of bond money for the “arena” is illegal because El Pasoans never voted for a basketball “arena” in November 2012 but rather a “multi-purpose performing arts and entertainment facility.” The conclusion of our case brief is as follows: “A basketball arena is not a performing arts center as a matter of law. The City has misused the funds approved in the 2012 Quality of Life bond election. Its actions are illegal, invalid, and a breach of its contractual obligations to the taxpayers of El Paso. The Court should reject the City’s request to validate its actions, issue a declaratory judgment that the Project described in them RFQ is not a project the voters approved, and enjoin the the City from expending any funds from the Quality of Life bond on the Project described in the RFQ.”

According to the article a hearing was held the other day.  In attendance representing the city were their out of town attorneys, their bond counsel, the city attorney and “others from her department”.

Does the city think they will lose?

If the city feels that they are right then why are they asking an out of town court to validate their authority to build the facility?  According to a May 5, 2107 Times article

“The city is seeking a court hearing to validate its stance that the controversial multipurpose arena can be built in Union Plaza in Downtown El Paso, according to documents filed this week in Austin.”

The city could have filed their motion in El Paso but they did not.  Filing in Austin makes it less convenient for us to participate.  It also gives some of our city employees some travel time.

It looks as through their are at least two issues here.  One is does the city have the right to build an arena when the voters were asked to approve a “multi-purpose performing arts and entertainment facility”?  Another relates to the location.

The image below is from the ballot that voters were given back in 2012:

It makes no mention of downtown in either language.

The city however has taken this position:

Why would the city do that?  The ballot language did not say downtown yet the bond election ordinance did.  Shouldn’t we expect more from the legion of city attorneys?  Shouldn’t we expect more from city council?

We deserve better


8 Responses to City fears they are wrong

  1. downtowner says:

    Grossman needs to get a life. He had his day in the limelight and is now suffering from withdrawal. If he got his way, there would be no improvements downtown. He protested every little change but failed to come up with one single solution. He is an obstructionist — at best.


  2. mamboman3 says:

    The city attorneys are nothing more than cheerleaders for the “progressive interests” and the city reps in their clutches. I would think a good attorney will seriously consider many perspectives and possible outcomes of a case but I’ve never seen Firth or any others do it unless they’ve done so in those executive sessions.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m sure that it is not at all necessary to “go out of town” to find a competent attorney for this City! But, I will agree that we could sure as hell use better legal representation. But, then, don’t forget, I still say we need to dump the City Manager form of government, and go back to a strong Mayor, and hold that person, along with City Council, totally responsible for City operation.


  4. James W Peterson says:

    Plus, when the bond passed. El Paso voters were under the impression that the City would no longer use eminent domain or displace residents. Right? I seem to recollect that was Cook’s stance and what voters had in mind as votes were cast.


  5. Would replacing our current city attorney with a lawyer help? Possibly. I hope Mayor Elect Margo will look at the long string of mishaps, missteps, screwups and take appropriate action. Administration after administration, mayor after mayor and council after council appear to have been given less than sterling advice. It is past time to go out of town to find a professional, experienced and competent City Attorney.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Old Gringo says:

      Isn’t it odd that City Attorneys, of which there is a gaggle, can’t handle City’s legal business? WTF do they get paid for.


      • epkamikazi says:

        In a case representing 4 Pitbull dogs that got loose and allegedly attacked a runner I was able to prevail over the city attorneys office in stopping theiir execution without due process because they, like another current leader we now have succumb to their feelings and took to the media, without actually knowing and following the state laws.

        I earned my juris prudence on Law and Order…


Leave a Reply -- you do not have to enter your email address

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: