Curve Ball

July 5, 2013

Over thirty years ago, a small group of El Paso Citizens thought that the City needed a venue to teach our children science. All science, a “hands on” museum where they can learn about nature, space, gravity, anatomy, etc. They put their money where their mouth was and through their tireless efforts, Insights Museum was born. Over the next 30 years plus, over a million Children from our school districts alone, learned the beauty of science. Countless physicists, chemists, physicians, engineers and even an astronaut, had their first exposure to the beauty of science at our museum. “Poof”, says the Wilson Quintet of Byrd, Cook, Lilly, Ortega and Niland and it’s gone. So we needed a downtown ballpark so the children can sit in the stands and eat junk food while watching minor league baseball players, hit, catch and scratch. Such a deal!

Always thinking of the children since they are our future, they tossed the Insights Museum out in the street, replacing it with first base.

Did they give us an interim location for our children? How about the El Paso train Station? No lets rent/give it to the Texas Tech Architectural School for $1.00 a year for 75 years. Some of our kids may become architects. I’ve got a better idea, let’s stick a Children’s museum into the Quality of life Bond issue which if they approve, will result in the City hall and the Insights Museum imploding. They think they are getting a museum but it will take 5 years if ever. Give the kids popcorn and cracker jacks.

Despite the City’s efforts, Insights lives on. There is an active board of directors who like their predecessors, see the value of a science museum for the children of El Paso. They see, out of the Rubble of the old Insights Museum a new and better era coming. I’m sure that the new Mayor and Council will see their value and give them the support they need. Oh yes we want to support the baseball team but isn’t this important?

Just think of it, dedicating space in the new baseball stadium addition in honor of the Insights Museum on which the stadium is situated. How about a display about the physics of a curve ball? a sinker? a fastball? ala George Wills. the art of hitting the ball, opposite field hitting etc. I’m sure we can come up with that type of display. Things don’t just happen by accident, there is a science to baseball Misters Doubleday, Foster and Hunt.


Reigning in begins

June 30, 2013

It looks like the new mayor is doing his job.

The July 2, 2013 city council agenda has two items posted in the addition to the agenda.  Both appear to have been placed on the agenda by the mayor.

The first is titled:

Discussion and action regarding a Resolution to revoke authority granted to the City Manager by the motion of City Council dated November 6, 2012, with regard to the leasing or purchasing of office space and parking in the Central Business District required for the relocation of City operations as a result of the relocation of City Hall.

The previous city council passed a motion on November 6, 2012 granting the city manager broad authority to lease property downtown for up to 5 years (limited to $2,500,000 per year).  The new resolution if passed would require the new city council to approve any new leases.

The second item is titled:

Discussion and action regarding a Resolution modifying the authority granted to the City Manager in connection with the awarding of Solicitation No. 2013-109R to Jordan Hunt, a Texas Joint Venture for the construction of the ballpark and requiring the exercise of all such authority be made in consultation with the Mayor of the City of El Paso.

In other words the city manager would have to keep the mayor informed about what is being done.  The resolution would not take power away from the city manager.  Instead it would allow the mayor to know what is happening so that he could re-direct the city manager through city council if he thought things were not going well.

Hallelujah!

It looks like the new mayor wants the mayor and council to take responsibility for what is happening instead of giving all authority to the city manager and then claiming that decisions on matters are not in their purview.  A large part of the mess we are in is a direct result of having a weak council and mayor.

I don’t feel comfortable making a prediction about whether these two items will pass.  What I do know is that any city council member that votes against these will be drawing a line in the sand.

To me this appears to be very smart on the part of the mayor.  I hope that he continues to apply this kind of thoughtful management to the mess that we are in.

We are getting better

Brutus


Delay for rain

June 18, 2013

While we are waiting for the summer monsoon to begin let’s do a recap of where we are with the ball park.

Their numbers are wrong

Various city officials stood before council and made official presentations

The city hall move will only cost $33 million

We are now over $70 million.  The fact is that the city officials had not studied the costs thoroughly  and simply made a presentation designed to get council to vote favorably.

The ballpark will only cost $50 million

They wanted a construction manager at risk — no bidding involved

The construction manager would get to keep a percentage of what was not needed of the construction budget. That was designed to make us think that the ball park could be built for less.

The city manager recently told us that they do not know what the ball park will cost.  They only have 20% of the bids in and will have to wait to see how much it will cost.  No serious study was given to the cost of the ball park before they stood before council.

The owners are not giving up $12 million.  Before this whole deal was sold to city council the owners said that they would donate their profits to charity for the foreseeable future.  The $12 million is being stolen from charity by the city.

Someone else will pay for the ball park

The hotel occupancy tax numbers are only estimates (from the same city staff that has made the other estimates).  There is no guarantee that those monies will come in.  The team ownership is committing to pay us over a 30 year lease.  What will happen if something goes wrong?  I would imagine that the ownership group might have to declare bankruptcy, thus leaving the citizens of El Paso responsible to make the bond payments.

We must do this immediately

Hasty, irresponsible actions were taken because we were told that  the ball park must be open at the beginning of the 2014 season.

Plans for the ball park have not even been drawn up yet.  We need plans first, bidding next, and then construction.  The chances of getting this done in time are negligible.  They always were.

City staff recently tried to buy the Diablos out of their lease of Cohen stadium.  Is it possible that they want the new team to play at Cohen while the ball park is being built?

Cohen is not acceptable

According to city staff, no amount of money spent for improvements to our existing ball park would make it acceptable to league management.

I simply do not believe them.

Now city staff tells us

The team owners are willing pay $12 million more

City staff came before council recently and asked for $10 million more to build a ball park “the public wants”.  $5 million was going to come from previously approved projects for sidewalks and streets.  The other $5 million was for contingencies.

Now the owners themselves say that $8 million more needs to be spent on the basic ball park.  What about the $10 million city staff asked for and got turned down on?  The city manager told us that moving the $5 million from sidewalks and streets  into the project would simplify coordination of the projects.  In other words, the city is going to spend the $5 million sprucing up the areas around the ball park anyway.  That puts us at $50 + $8 + $5 or $63 million without the contingency fund.

As the city manager recently confessed, no one knows what this will cost.  I would have been in favor of a properly researched and planned project.

I think that the ball park should now be built even though the way we got here was horrible.

I hope that the new city council slows this deal down and gets real numbers before we get in even deeper.  At the very least the contracts should be changed to eliminate any penalties to the city if the ball park is not finished in time.  After all, the ball park owners are the ones that are asking for the changes.

We deserve better

Brutus


Just getting started

May 25, 2013

Before even breaking ground on our new ball park the city is telling us that they need $10 million more to build it than the $50 million they told us it would cost.  They also need another $750,000 for design and management work.

Who is responsible for this situation?

Let’s start with the city engineer.  A recent headline article in the El Paso Times quotes him as having said “We could not build the project we have designed without it … We would have to redesign it … It would not be the ballpark the community wants.  It would not be iconic or state of the art.”

The city engineer said that the ball park that the city committed to could not be built.  He was in charge of the technical details.  Is he incompetent, or is he a liar?  Why rig a bid when you can fool City Council? showed us an example of how this individual plays loose with the truth.

Now he tells us that the street and sidewalk “work would have been done by other contractors while the ballpark was built, but that it made more sense to have the general contract oversee the work for better coordination”.  More sense to whom?  His job is to oversee the construction.  This is a no bid give away.  El Paso’s contractors should raise Cain.

Then we have the city manager.  It was her job to see to it that her subordinates did good work.  The city manager made presentations to council selling a ball park that we now know could not be built.  The current decisions being placed before city council must have had her approval.

Demolishing trust pointed out how city staff had found a way to spend $500,000 over and above the $50 million budget building a pedestrian walkway that the ball park needed.  Then it told us about how the city water utility was using customer money to provide new water and sewer facilities to the ball park — once again outside the $50 million budget.

Now the staff wants to use $3 million that was to be used for downtown street projects.  Another $2 million will be stolen from the 2012 quality of life bonds that we approved for the downtown cultural district.  Baseball is not we think of when we speak of culture.  Where is the bond oversight committee?  What committee?  We didn’t promise to listen!  gave us an idea what to expect.

Then we have city council.  Are they part of this lie?  At this point we are in a situation where denying the $10 million dollars could cause the project to fail.  Did city staff fail or did city staff lie?

I guess if I were on city council I would ultimately vote for the $10 million.  I would only do that after I had the written resignations of the city engineer, the chief financial officer, and the city manager.  No resignations, no ball park.  We are going to have to spend good money after bad, but we should not let the same people administer it.

The owners

The team owners are developers.  They know about sidewalks and streets and how they affect projects.  I suspect they knew this was coming.  If one of their employees came to them with a $10 million cost overrun on a $50 million dollar project I suspect that some heads would roll.

The Times article tells us that “the $5 million in contingency funds would pay for amenities such as a bar-restaurant or group and party suites “.  It sounds to me that decisions have been made about how to spend the money.  There is no contingency fund.

Group and party suites will be among the most expensive facilities for the public to buy tickets to.  The profits will be higher on these facilities than on regular tickets.  Who will enjoy the benefit of this extra income after the citizens have spent $5 million?  I suspect that the money will go to the team owners.

The owners have always seemed to me to be good citizens.  Yet they seem to be going along with this two-step theft.  They certainly have not spoken publicly against it.  They benefit from it.  I don’t see how we can trust them in the future.

Not done yet

Like most things we will have to wait to discover the full level of deception here.  Will we end up over $100 million?

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty

Cato


Runoff support started

May 13, 2013

A businessman forced a city council member into a runoff according to this propaganda piece from the El Paso Times.  Calling it a news article strains my ability to be civil.

The facts are that the businessman had well over 50% of the early voting.  That was enough to get him elected.  The city council member improved his standing with the election day vote.  He forced the businessman into a runoff.

That is unless you take the view that the city council member was supposed to win and the upstart businessman disrupted the Times ordained result.  The word writer is more appropriate than reporter in this case.

She wrote of the council member  “(he)  has argued that voters supported the ballpark and its location through the November 2012 vote that designated the ballpark as a venue and authorized the use of hotel occupancy tax dollars to finance it.”

Yes he has argued that, just like a lawyer  is paid to make an argument that he knows not to be true.

This October 27. 2012 Times article by the same writer had the title:

El Paso Mayor John Cook: ‘No’ vote on stadium bond means El Pasoans will pay, not visitors

The writer dutifully quoted our mayor as saying “We are asking voters to approve a way to pay for the ballpark and not whether the city should build it.”

The writer knew the argument was a false one, she herself documented the proof.  Yet she did what she could to further the lie.

This link to the definition of integrity might help her.

Muckraker