The Problem of Representative Government

February 5, 2016

Our current problems with elected officials representing their own interests instead of ours are not new and the solution was the same back then as it is now.

William Willoughby wrote this in 1919:

The Problem of Representative Government

This type of government, from its very nature, raised a political problem of prime importance.  How are the people to make sure that their representative, the legislature, will in fact, represent them in the sense that its action will accord with their wishes?  This is a problem which, in spite of our hundred or more years of experience with the system, has not yet been solved.  It is only too well known that in many cases legislatures have failed utterly to translate into action the wishes of the people represented by them.  In many cases they can be said to represent the people only in name, since the election of their members has been controlled or dictated by a small part of the voters to whom we have given the opprobrious names of the “ring”, the “machine”, the “bosses”, etc.  Often members of legislatures have used their powers to promote personal or party interests rather than those of the people as a whole.

The remedy

The solution back then as it is now was to vote these people out of office.

We deserve better

Brutus

 


Pavement condition index

February 4, 2016

Once upon a time the city published their pavement condition index  for members of the public to review.

As part of what appears to be a systematic program to minimize information available to the public the index has been removed from their web site.

Taking the index off of the web site was a deliberate action.  Not replacing it was another deliberate action.

We deserve better

Brutus


Shutting down access to information

February 3, 2016

The city is definitely in cover up mode.

The last financial report available on their website is for April of 2015.

That’s almost a year ago.

We deserve better

Brutus


Knowing who is important

February 1, 2016

Watching the video of the Monday, January 25, 2015 legislative review meeting of our city council we saw an interesting event at the very end of the meeting.

Council had scheduled two simultaneous meetings, the legislative review and a special city council meeting.

Members of the public that wanted to attend the special city council meeting had to wait from 9:05 to 10:40 that morning before the legislative review meeting was over and the special council meeting was started.

Councilwoman Limon asked if they might change their policy and schedule the second meeting at a time where the public could reasonably expect the meeting to start.

She was told that the current method was used to “save time”.  Not our time but their time.

Thank you for trying Mrs. Limon!

We deserve better

Brutus


City Council meeting review

January 31, 2016

Helen Marshall sent this in:

If you thought Monday Council was bad.

I went to Council Tuesday to hear the discussion about the “Hispanic” cultural center, which is now the Mexican-American Cultural Center (or Institute if Rep. Limón’s efforts are successful) and the Animal Shelter presentation.  The agenda showed various activities, including beginning with the Consent Agenda, Items 1-16,  Four Proclamations, and some Recognitions of City Employees.  A Call to the Public from 8 am to 8:30 am.  Someone screwed up with those hours, as the Agenda started at 8 am but all these other events took place first.  The Proclamations consumed over half a hour.  And then the recognitions…groups  of employees who had completed their “Green Belt” in Lean 6 Sigma.  Another large group who were in training but had not completed their “project.”  Another group receiving their “Yellow Belt.”  Apparently the entire city staff will undergo this brainwashing.  All of these recognitions required photo ops.  Employees who had served 15 (I believe, I dozed off), 25 or more years individually recognized.  And then anyone who had completed a degree, including online courses, was recognized.  I was afraid they were going to cite those who had a GED… Well over an hour was spent in this.  At this point it was after 10 am, and I expected that items 17 and 18 on the agenda would be next.

But no!  The Mayor called for item 20, discussion and action on proposed changes to the Competitive Sealed Bid Policy.  Rep. Niland used this as an opportunity to whack Gonzalez about San Jacinto Plaza and the Westside Pool.  Dr. Noe offered up praise for Bruce Collins, purchasing guru, and he and several others assured Collins that there was no intent to impugn his integrity.  The pontificating and posturing went on for another hour.  Niland demanded that Collins convene another community meeting about San Jacinto and the Westside Pool and assure the public that the delays were the fault of staff and Gonzales, not Council (i.e, “not her fault”).  Council did not include that in the motion that eventually passed, approving the revisions as presented with one or two tweaks.  Following that came item 21, a motion dealing with additional funding for the Westside pool, and some more pontificating.  

Apparently the speaker for the CSB item was ill and had just come in for that. Why then they allowed 1.5 hours for employee recognition beforehand is a mystery.  Why not a special meeting for that?

Finally, sometime after 11 am –  Item 17 – The Mexican American Cultural “Entity” was then introduced.  A consultant read out page after page after page of recommendations, displayed on the screens in excruciatingly small print.  An associated architect presented some designs and charts about space and timelines.  Intense discussion ensued.  All very interesting but having nothing to do with the motion on the floor, which was to accede to the request of the committee and designate the Chavez theater as the site for the new MACC or MACI.  The real issue is that $5.7 million was set aside in the QOL bonds for this cultural center, and the subcommittee and its advisers indicate that something closer to $34 million will be needed.  It is true that much of this is for an upgrade of the Chavez theater, which should have been done before, but the fact remains that without the Chavez there would not even be a hope of putting together a Cultural Center with $5.7 million total.  FInally a vote was taken and the site was designated, and the subcommittee will continue to work on figuring out how to raise at least most of this money.  There was some idea that at least the initial phase could be constructed and opened by December 2017 (no one was bold enough to suggest that it might occur before the dedication of the redo of San Jacinto Plaza..) 

Item 18, which I had expected to hear about 9:30 am, was introduced shortly after one pm.  No break was taken for the audience, although it did appear that some staff and council members retreated to their offices behind the scenes to grab something to eat.  Representative Ordaz turned the discussion into a session to attack the current situation at Animal Services, presenting photos that she said had been taken by two volunteers, claiming that dog bowls were left empty or filled with feces, etc.  The entire discussion, not germane to the motion regarding finances, revolved around treatment of dogs and in particular why any injured dogs brought in were not given medical care immediately.  Twelve people spoke from the floor.  Finally the motion to provide the money for FY16 was passed.  

There were still items concerning actions related to the visit of Pope Francis, among others, but at 3 pm I (and my rear end) could not take any more and departed.  Fortunately I had parked north of the freeway and walked down, as all the meters in the vicinity of City One are 2-hour limits as far as I know.  Be very aggravating to have to pay a parking fine for listening to this.  Apparently another 4 or 5 hours was consumed, with a recess, finally, about 5 pm.  The time spent could be greatly reduced if the mayor would cut off some of the posturing and whining, but ….  we’d need a strong mayor for that.