A dear friend sent me a copy of the book Democracy in the Dark/The Seduction of Government Secrecy. Reading the book got me to thinking about the secrecy that the city engages in.
Our city council appears to finally be paying attention to the situation at San Jacinto Plaza.
The other day council went into executive session for an extended period and when they came out they told us that they had been advised by the city attorney not to say anything.
They did say that they wanted weekly updates on the situation. Is this so that the public will be informed? The answer is no. The first weekly update was this week and was also in executive session. When council reconvened they did not say a word about the Plaza.
Why the secrecy?
Could it be that the city fears a lawsuit from the contractor?
If that’s the case then the city might be culpable for the delay. If the contractor is right don’t we have the right to know? Shouldn’t we know so that we can demand that changes occur in the departments at fault?
What right does the city have to hide the truth from us?
If the city has done nothing wrong why are they hiding the facts from us? Are they afraid of a groundless lawsuit? That would be strange. The city legal department has used lawsuits to beat people out of what they deserve before.
Secrecy here serves no purpose other than to protect the city. They should make the facts public.
We deserve better
Brutus
You must be logged in to post a comment.