Another inconvenience

October 6, 2014

The Tuesday, October 7, 2014 city council agenda has an item on it that once again shows who they think is important.  The answer certainly is not the taxpayers.

As part of the destruction of city hall and the moving of city departments into several buildings the city leased about 8,000 square feet of office space in what we now call the Wells Fargo building.

The department that the city placed in the space is the city tax office.  Taxpayers must now go to the 3rd floor of the building in order to do any city tax business that they want to do in person.  At this point no other city office that they have told us about is in that building.  Before they tore down the old city hall a taxpayer could go in, conduct his tax related business, and then drop by his city representative’s office or the mayor’s office to speak with their elected officials.

Placing the tax office in a building away from every other department and away from the elected officials has resulted in less opportunity for taxpayers to communicate with the city officials. The tax office was probably chosen as the department to be banished to a separate building because it would limit communication.

Now citizens have to pay for parking when they go to the tax office.  The most convenient place to park is in the Wells Fargo parking garage if space is available.

Part of the lease agreement that the city signed required the landlord to provide parking for the city tax office employees “within walking distance” of the offices.

That evidently has become inconvenient for our city employees.  The agenda item proposes a no-cost modification to the lease that requires that the parking spaces be made available in the Wells Fargo parking garage.   Walking distance seems to have become inconvenient for our employees.

If they pass the amendment and the parking garage is full then taxpayers will have to do the walking.

We deserve better

Brutus


Downtown arena

October 4, 2014

On August 14, 2012 the mayor of El Paso signed ordinance 017849 ordering our 2012 quality of life bond election.  The ordinance outlines the specific projects that were to be proposed and voted on.  From the ordinance:

“… an election shall be held on the 6th day of November 2012, in the city … for the purpose of submitting the following measures:”

“Shall the City Council of the City of El Paso, Texas, be authorized to issue general obligation bonds of the City in the principal amount of $228,250,000 for permanent public improvements and public purposes, to wit:  acquiring, constructing, improving, renovating and equipping new and existing library, museum, cultural and performing arts facilities and improvements, including the acquisition of land and rights-of-way for such projects, and acquiring and installing public art related to and being a part of some or all of the foregoing; such projects to include the following:

Arts & Entertainment

Multipurpose performing arts and entertainment facility located in Downtown El Paso;

Downtown

The ordinance specifically proposes a performing arts and entertainment facility located in Downtown El Paso.  City council has been kind enough to publish maps telling us what they consider to be downtown.

The election was held. The public voted in favor of building the performing arts and entertainment facility.

One little problem

However on May 28, 2013 (7 months after the bond election) the city signed a lease with a baseball team group relating to the new ball park.

Section 15.3(c) reads:

neither City nor any Affiliate of City, shall, directly or indirectly, develop, finance, facilitate or otherwise participate in the development or approval of any other outdoor concert venue in downtown El Paso that is reasonably anticipated to compete with the Ballpark, with the exception of a soccer stadium for a Major League Soccer team.

Concert venue, downtown

It would appear that we could have a conflict.  The city got us to vote for a downtown performing arts facility.  Then they signed a lease prohibiting them to build one.

Will we have to pay the sports group for this?  Will the city just build it’s performing arts center somewhere outside of the downtown area.  Will the performing arts money be “repurposed” to build something different?

Texas law requires that bond money be spent the way the bond ordinance specifies.

The actual signed lease with the sports group is not available on the city’s web site.  The document that I have quoted from was presented to city council as part of the change process when the sports group agreed to pay for any costs above $62 million.

Outdoor

The key word here is outdoor.  The city agreed to not build an outdoor venue.  That will limit our design of the new facility.  It will need to be enclosed in a building.

 

We deserve better

Brutus


Hidden taxes

October 3, 2014

I wonder how many fees that the city charges are not directly related to a service but instead just augment the general fund.

So far I have been able to find these:

El Paso water utilities pays the city 10% of the monies it receives from the sale of water.  In the 2015 city budget the number is estimated to be $11.1 million.  This is in addition to the new fee that is being charged to “non residential” customers.  That fee will bring about $3.5 million to the city.

Our international bridges operate at a profit and contribute $13.6 million to the city general fund after expenses.

From what I can see in the city budget, the sanitation department will contribute $22.6 million.

They also plan to receive more than $49 million in franchise fees, which we know are passed on to the consumers.

We pay almost $16 million each year for storm water drainage, a fee that used to be part of the regular city budget.

There are probably more funds like these.  Maybe our readers can help us to figure this out.

As it is the city is receiving almost $116 million that does not add to our property taxes.  However it is still us providing the money.  Our total property tax bill is about $228 million so the $116 million represents hidden taxes of 50%.

We deserve better

Brutus


Height of incompetence?

October 2, 2014

Shortly after yesterday’s post about BRIO (our new rapid transit system)  was published I overheard a conversation between a Sun Metro bus driver and a passenger.

I don’t know if what I heard is true, so I may be guilty of spreading an unfounded rumor.

The passenger asked the driver when the BRIO system would be going into operation.

The driver responded that there may be some more delays since some of the BRIO stations have platforms that are too far above the surface of the street.  In other words they don’t fit the new buses.

We should all hope that this is not true.  If it is we will have yet another example of incompetence at the city.

Then later in the day I saw two articles on the same page of the Times.  One was talking about the tuberculosis scare at a local hospital and the other told us about  our public health department’s spokesman wanting us not to worry about Ebola since “Public health officials already have a system in place with local hospitals to detect, report and track contagious diseases”.

We deserve better

Brutus


Rapid? Maybe, but still late.

October 1, 2014

So far our new rapid transit system has done more to disrupt traffic than anything else.

Brio, as it is known,  was scheduled to be finished in the summer of this year.  I doubt anyone is surprised that summer has come and gone and the construction is still not finished.

They may be close though.  I look forward to trying the service.  Their plan to have a bus arrive at each stop every ten minutes during the busy periods may make bus travel between the west side to UTEP and downtown practical.

If the service is not successful we will have to increase the subsidy that the city pays Sun Metro.

If the service is successful the merchants that are near a Brio station will have to learn how to deal with the extra cars that will be parked in their lots by the bus riders.

Watching the construction and implementation process it looks like the stations have quite a few components.  These components will require maintenance and protection.  Some of the stations even have solar powered trash compactors.  My prediction is that they will not last long.

Sun Metro is having problems with people thinking that the stations are regular bus stops.  They have even had to put up signs explaining that even though they look like bus stops they aren’t yet.  They would do well to start letting us know what is going on and when to expect the service to start.

We deserve better

Brutus