An experienced doctor comments about medicine today

July 29, 2017

This was sent in to us recently:

During the 4 decades of my clinical training and practice of medicine, I always felt a sense of ownership and full responsibility in caring for my patients. What I have noticed over the past decade is a gradual transformation in our health care delivery system and in the attitude of our trainees.
Hospitals are being governed as for-profit corporations, run by administrators and lawyers, rather than by physicians, with the aim of becoming more profitable. The same mentality that runs Wall Street has permeated into our noble health care profession, wherein the physicians delivering health care to the patients are viewed as providers delivering goods to the clients. And, as the practice of medicine has turned into a business-oriented model, administrators and lawyers have gained much influence on doctors’ practice of medicine.
House-staff have adopted bankers’ hours, that is, at 5 or 6 PM their responsibilities end, and they pass their patients on to the night shift. Students and residents are more likely to consult Google than to read medical textbooks or do literature search in order to gain in-depth knowledge of a subject. There is a constant rush to finish rounds and notes and to pass on the responsibility of patient care to the next shift. House-staff spend more time on the electronic health record than visiting and examining patients. Morning rounds consist of reading the night shift notes. Murmurs, crackles, edema, etc. are missed because doctors are too busy at their computers writing billable notes. Patients’ related discussions are more often at computer side than at bedside. Notes in electronic health records have gotten longer while their content has gotten less relevant, though more billable. Attending, fellow, resident, and student notes reiterate the same information, each with 10-15 continuous pages. Our billing is compared with other centers to encourage higher billing levels. Patient satisfaction scores for faculty, which predominately reflect the style of the medical care delivery, rather than its quality, are compared to make the business more attractive to our clients (patients).
In 2002 Professor Richard Cooper et al predicted a future workforce shortage in medicine.1 His efforts resulted in increasing numbers of US medical schools, and thus, less reliance on international medical graduates for residency training. The new US medical graduates, who are an average $200,000 in debt, are, not surprisingly, seeking high-paying jobs as hospitalists, and thus, the subspecialties are seeing fewer applicants. Why would anyone who is already $200,000 in debt spend 2 or 3 additional years in training only to be subsequently hired with an income that is at least $100,000 less than a beginning hospitalist? I anticipate a great shortage in the workforce in many subspecialties in the near future.
Although patients in clinic receive continuity of care, their encounters with their primary care physicians are brief, as he/she spends more time staring at a computer screen typing notes than talking with and examining the patient. Patients admitted to a hospital see a new hospitalist on call every 12 hours, who in turn must consult with many subspecialties in order not to miss a serious issue, as they are unfamiliar with the patient and his/her medical problems. The hospital benefits from the multiple consultations and the patient leaves the hospital with multiple bills.
In summary, I am witnessing the commercialization of the health care system as it focuses on industrial-style efficiency and productivity, and with that, losing its original purpose of one human being giving care and comfort to another. I am witnessing the gradual disappearance of good role models, the giants in pathophysiology who understood best the mechanisms of illnesses, those with extraordinary bedside manners and clinical judgment who cared for the body and soul of the patient in a most compassionate manner.
Although this sounds like an old fashioned and nostalgic dream, I just wanted to get it off my chest and share it with those who may feel the same.
Bahar Basmani MD The Am Jour of Medicine

 


Too much

July 28, 2017

As we wrote in $10 million that the city says they don’t need:

When we voted it was called a “Heritage Cultural Center” then it was the “Hispanic Cultural Center” and now it is the “Mexican American Cultural Center”.

At the time a city appointed committee that included our district attorney, former county judge, former United States congressman and the former national president of LULAC said that they would raise $20 million to support the center.

According to a recent article in the Times the group and its successors has managed to raise $15,400 in the last two years.

Now a board member of the Mexican American Cultural Institute has told city council:

“When the subcommittee gave their report to the city, it was a different group of people than the organization that became the Mexican American Cultural Institute today.  The $20 million is that subcommittee’s assessment on what would be a viable amount to raise.  That was not a pledge from MACI proper.”

The other day someone from MACI addressed council and told them that they need still more money.

As voters we approved $5.7 million.  City council later voted to add $10 million that we evidently did not need for roads and things like that.  Now the estimated cost will be $34.6 million.

But wait!

As it turns out the center will be too expensive for MACI to operate so it wants city council to pay for the operating costs in addition to coming up with another $18.9 million to bring the total to $34.6 million.

There’s still more!

The group also wants to keep all (any) of the revenue generated.  In addition they want control over what events will be held at the center.

Let’s get real

The simple fact is that this group does not have the public support to build such a center.  Otherwise they would have been able to raise more money.

Thank you city council!

Council would have none of this nonsense.  They unanimously voted to send the group back to the drawing board and set an October 1, 2017 deadline for the group to come back with a better proposal.

Our proposal is that we use the $5.7 million that the voters wanted to spend and call the facility the “Heritage Cultural Center” as the voters approved.

We deserve better

Brutus


Thoughts about our congressman

July 27, 2017

David K. over at Refuse the Juice recently published a post that in part dealt with the lack of influence El Paso has at the congressional level.

He also had some interesting thoughts about the upcoming congressional race.

Read the post here.

We deserve better

Brutus


Sun Metro’s evaporating revenue

July 26, 2017

The proposed 2017-2018 city budget has a line item for fare box revenue.

They budgeted $9,350,000 in 2016.

For 2017 they budgeted $8,000,000.

The preliminary budget number for 2018 is $6,600,000.

Yet the city continues to spend tens of millions to increase capacity.

We deserve better

Brutus


Spend less, tax more

July 25, 2017

Simply put:

Yet their proposed budget indicates spending will actually go down $4.9 million from last year.

How can that be?  They predict a decrease in revenues other than property taxes.  That’s what happens when our economy slows down.

We deserve better

Brutus