Try to get a home mortgage like this one

April 14, 2015

Back in 2013 we were told that our debt costs relating to the ball park were going to be $17 million more than the numbers we had when the election was held.

The reason?  Bond buyers thought our deal was too risky and they wanted more money in return for their risk.

Well as it turns out the real number was $27.5 million.

According to the Times the Downtown Development Corporation (city council in sheep’s clothing) was never told about the extra $10.5 million.

How convenient.  Those bad former city employees did this to us.  Never mind council’s responsibility to see to it that our money is managed well.

Now we are being told that general fund money will be necessary until 2023.

That isn’t the half of it. The city’s chart printed below shows that we are not even going to make principal payments until 2023.  Then we will have to make a $17.6 million dollar payment against the principal. Where will that money come from?  If they take it from the general fund they will be using property tax money and Texas law does not allow that.  Will some future council have to levy some new fee?  Will there be a bond election to issue debt to pay debt?

2013aTaxExemptBonds

 

Will the perpetrators ever be punished?

We deserve better

Brutus

 


Roosters coming home

April 13, 2015

It should not surprise us that the numbers recently released by the city show that their previous revenue projections relating to the ballpark were wrong.

Hotel occupancy taxes, sales taxes, and parking revenue were all over estimated.  Even the “crazies” might see how one number was missed, but all three?

One number came in better than expected–ticket sales.  More people attended games than they projected.  That is good.

Why then were parking revenues below expectations?  Did someone game that revenue source or was the original number miscomputed?  A city official promised to look into that.

The net effect is that the city had to take almost one million dollars out of the general fund to pay interest on the bonds that we were told would be self sustaining.

The general fund is made up of property and sales taxes as well as fees and fines.  Last year city council had to levy a multi-million dollar fee against water bills to cover a shortfall in the city budget.

Texas state law does not allow the city to pay for the ballpark with property taxes because of the way the election was held.  Yet the city is using general fund money to do it.

Some will try to argue that the specific part of the general fund they are using does not come from property taxes.  That is like trying to argue that your spouse’s paycheck does not contribute to your mortgage payment.

The facts are in.  There should be consequences for the people that did this to us.   If laws have not been violated then maybe at the least we should publicly shun the former city employees that did this to us.

What will the city council do about this?

We deserve better

Brutus

 


Ball Game Special

April 12, 2015

This from Helen Marshall:

I am glad that Sun Metro is offering help to get to the ball games, more or less confirming that there is in fact far too little parking downtown, especially if there is another event on the same evening as a game.

BUT.  Where we are, near Kern Place, is  about two miles to downtown or to the GLory Road transfer station (where there is no service).  To use the Ball Game Special, I would have to drive nearly ten miles to the Remcon Transfer Station, and then take the bus back downtown!  Seems a bit crazy.  This scheme works for those who are near that transfer station, or live north of it in the Upper Valley. …

 

 


More taxes for some

April 11, 2015

Michael Bray sent this in:

Well then! Transparency does not mean crystal clear!

 

Rearranging the Property Tax Deck Chairs

 

http://www.texastransparency.org/Special_Features/Bond_Elections/bond-master.php

 


Questions for council candidates #3 (Alameda Brio)

April 10, 2015

Today’s suggested question is:

Will you vote to stop the spending of $35 million to build the Alameda Brio system?

We deserve better

Brutus