Digital wall might be here eventually

December 13, 2014

One of the signature projects of the quality of life bonds is the digital wall.

El Paso will be the second city on the planet to have one of these 3 million dollar television sets.  The city hoped to get a donor to build an addition to the museum so that the wall could be inside.  There were evidently no takers for that million dollar project.

The wall  was originally scheduled to be completed in August, 2014.  It was later rescheduled to be completed in December, 2014.

We have not heard about it lately so I presume that completion in 2015 is more probable.

Several posts have been written about it in the past.  Links to them are listed here for the convenience of our many new readers who probably have not taken the time to search our archives:

Bridge for sale

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark

El Paso quality of life update

Shocking news

Going down under

Too many chiefs  (By the way I applaud the city manager–he evidently came to the same conclusion)

My prediction is that this thing will be a maintenance nightmare.

I can’t help but wonder how many streets could have been paved with this money.  Talk about quality of life.

We deserve better

Brutus


Let’s do the children’s hospital deal right

December 12, 2014

Our county hospital administrator has told us that he believes our children’s hospital should be placed under the county hospital, in other words under his control.

This is the same hospital administrator that has been under fire lately.

No one has yet  explained how  the citizens of El Paso could approve bonds to pay for the construction of the children’s hospital and the county hospital would have the right to charge the children’s hospital rent.  We paid for the facility  and gave it to the children’s hospital.  Why does the county hospital deserve rent income for it?

If the children’s group could actually afford to make the rent payments the county hospital would be the beneficiary of an additional $10 million a year of income,  just as if we had voted for a tax increase for the hospital.

Our county hospital administrator was at the head of the parade supporting the building of the children’s hospital.  Studies showed that the children’s hospital would be financially viable.  What he failed to tell us was that the study was based on a considerably smaller facility.  What we got was never predicted to be viable by any published study.

Last year our county hospital administrator was given $150 million of bond money to build three new out-patient clinics and to refurbish part of the hospital.  If the hospital was truly running profitably it would have been able to do the refurbishing with operating revenues.  Shortly after getting the money our administrator declared that the money needed to be “repurposed”.

The future

People from the children’s hospital and from the county hospital have been working to try to find a way to solve the financial problems.

Now we are told that the way to do this is to bring the children’s hospital under the county umbrella.

This doesn’t make sense to me.  I would think that a private or not-for-profit group would have high interest in being able to operate a hospital where they have no rent to pay.  Yet it looks like no one wants to do it.

Could it be that our hospital administrator has deliberately been unreasonable in whatever negotiations that have been held?  Could it be that no one wants the children’s hospital because he ran the interested parties off?  Could he have contributed to the failure of the children’s hospital so that he could gain control of it?

Whether you trust him or not, the hospital administrator should not be the one handling these negotiations.  He has a conflict of interest.

One technique that might work here is to issue a request for proposals (RFP).  The RFP would ask interested parties to tell us under what conditions they would operate a children’s hospital in the facility and what level of services they would provide.

We have the wrong people handling this situation.

We deserve better

Brutus


This may take two steps

December 11, 2014

The county tells us that their selection process designed to pick the new county administrator has narrowed the field down to four people, all from out of town.

Most of the departments at the county are run by elected officials.  Hired administrators don’t get to tell elected officials what to do in their own departments.

We have the city manager form of government over at the city.  Our city charter gives the city manager operational control of all city departments with the exception of the city attorney.

The elected officials at the county are prohibited from delegating the authority to run their own departments, so the future county administrator could at most be assigned responsibility for the departments that the county operates that are not required by our state constitution.

If you subscribe to the belief that our county should only provide the services that are required by the state then you won’t see much use for a county administrator.

We also should consider the fact that most of us will expect the county administrator to be non political.  Ask our hospital administrator how it feels to be swimming in a pool filled with politicians.  Whether he deserves it or not he is certainly in troubled water.

Somehow I doubt that any of the four announced finalists will get hired.  If I am wrong, watch for the dust-up that will probably occur, a dust-up that will “require” the new administrator to leave.  That way the politicians can have one of their own in the job.

We deserve better

Brutus


We operate Sun Metro in New Mexico

December 10, 2014

An alert citizen sent word to me the other day that he saw a Sun Metro bus in Sunland Park, New Mexico.

He was upset with the fact that El Paso taxpayers are paying the bill for Sun Metro and here we are giving service to people from another city in another state.

Of the $67 million that Sun Metro is budgeted to cost us in fiscal year (FY) 2015, $40 million will come from a portion of our local sales tax revenue.  He was right in that any money not spent on Sun Metro could be spent on other city needs.

By the way, of the $22 million that they report as service fees, $11 million is a federal transportation administration grant.    In other words our $66 million bus system collects $11 million from passengers.

I looked into the issue to see if we are in fact running buses out of town.

To my surprise I learned that we operate:

Route 83–NM Sunland Park via McNutt

Route 84–EPCC Mission del Paso via Clint & Socorro

County Route 10–Anthony/Canutillo

County Route 20–Montana Vista

County Route 30–Horizon City

County Route 40–Fabens/Tornillo

We deserve better

Brutus


Don’t Drink The Toilet Water

December 9, 2014

Mr. Jimmy Janacek sent us this  document titled “Don’t Drink The Toilet Water”.  Click on this link:

DON’T DRINK THE TOILET WATER

Reading it I saw a link to another blog named “Citizens Make The Call” that we are adding to our list of local blogs.  I suggest that you spend some time looking at what they say.

Brutus