What will he do?

Many of us say that this election cycle has been about city management, not the city manager.

Incredibly the city manager has taken action that may make the runoff elections about her too.  This article in the El Paso Times explains a lot.  She is requesting a 5% pay raise above what she currently gets paid, which is about $239,000 according to the article.

This puts the city councilman who is in the runoff for mayor in a strange position.  If he endorses the raise he risks angering the 78% of the voters who did not vote for him in the first election.  If he declines then he is biting the hand that feeds him.  What will he do?  We might not find out until after the runoff.  He should be asked.

The timing of this request is remarkable.  “I want to be in good standing at the time the new Mayor and council take office in late June” was the quote attributed to her by the Times.   One might think that the current city council should evaluate her past performance since the new elected officials will know less about her performance.  Then again you might think that the current city council should leave it up to the soon to be elected one since it will be their job to manage her.

To me the self-centered, selfish nature of this request and its timing are unfortunate.

I would hope that city council would consider her request seriously.  I offer some points that they might want to consider also:

Her request for a 5% raise would give her much more than council gave city employees last year.  My recollection is that some city police officers did get a raise last year, but it was around 1.8%.

We have found no evidence that she has called any citizens “crazies” recently.  Then again many e-mails are tied up in an expensive lawsuit against the attorney general of Texas that the city is paying for with our money.

While redevelopment is important to her, the plan to spend the bond money that she recently had presented to council does not provide anything for a new children’s museum or to replace the vital Chelsea swimming pool anytime in the next three years.  You can read more about these issues in Shovel ready.

Her plan to relocate city departments since city hall was going to be torn down displaced citizens from a popular recreation center with city administrators.  So much for quality of life talked about this shameful act.

City purchasing uses buy-boards to avoid competitive bidding.  One particular board that the city has spent millions of dollars through requires that 4% of the money spent be given to Houston school districts, not ours.  See More of Our Money for Houston.

Her $33 million plan to move city hall is now well over $70 million.  $63.9 million and climbing is the last detailed accounting.  We will have to wait for projects to be completed before we will know the total  We were either lied to or management is incompetent.

Since a small piece of land that the ball park will sit on was owned by the railroad the city had to bend over backwards.  Fireworks talked about how the city agreed to close many railroad crossings through town without consulting with the public or other government agencies.  The resulting inconvenience will be massive.

In her haste to build new city facilities much money was wasted.  The saga continues showed us how the city manager forgot her place and how her new office was to be larger than the mayor’s.  More money was wasted when newly remodeled space that was never occupied had to be torn down so that larger offices could be built for the mayor.

Now the city wants to kick the ground lease paying El Paso Independent School District central office off airport land with a resultant cost to the taxpayers of about $40 million while the city gives an out of town university virtually free use of other buildings.  See Plane wrong.

This list could go on much longer.  You get the idea.

Some will say that many of the items above are the result of city council actions.  That is true.  What also is true is that the city manager gets her way with city council and that she is behind what happened in most of the list.

Please do not post a comment about how I hate the city manager.  I do not.  Council has failed in their responsibility to manage her.  The city manager has stepped over the line and actively creates policy when it is her job to implement what council decides.

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.

Cato

7 Responses to What will he do?

  1. Unknown's avatar MEK says:

    You never comment on how impotent city council members are since your allegation is that they allow the CM to run roughshod over the council members. Human nature is that the weak are overcome by the powerful. So – we have a bunch of impotent council people that have no backbone to go against the city manager. That’s not her problem – that’s the voters problem – they elected the impotent people. You need to study animal behavior – its the same thing.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Interested Bystander says:

      Yes, animal behavior is a great analogy. Our city leadership consists of some very hungry animals, some of whom run in a pack. They tend to follow the big “PAC” and obey those who keep them well fed and on tight leashes. When they get a bone in their mouth as they did with the domestic partner benefits issue, they won’t let go. They remind me of wolves in sheep clothing.

      Since you suggested this line of thinking, I guess we could liken the city manager to Cruella DeVil, who keeps taking puppies (taxpayers) to be skinned so she can please a few who want luxurious things.

      Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Mother Superior says:

    Isn’t this a lame duck council? How can they do this? Oh I know they own the city Attorney. Rules do not matter for them.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar MEK says:

      The entire council is not lame duck. Susie, Steve and Cook are termed out. Carl is running for a 2nd term. The mayor has the power to run the city attorney’s office – no one else – not council, not the CM. Wonder who Leeser will hire as city attorney?

      Like

  3. Unknown's avatar FedUp says:

    According to the Times article about Wilson’s request for her review and raise, she attended a two-day seminar in February where topics discussed included “ethics refresher, email etiquette, council/manager communications and effective relations.”

    Let me get this straight. So, the taxpayers PAID for her to travel to a 2-day seminar to re-learn ethics, e-mail etiquette and council communications, so she could say she checked the box and then get her raise? We had to pay for her bad behavior. If she is so experienced and professional, that “refresher” should not have been necessary, especially for someone making nearly a quarter of a million dollars a year and a lot more if you plus up the bennies.

    What’s truly amazing is that Wilson claims she was able to totally adjust her attitude and her respect for others so quickly and easily.

    Cook more of less skated on the reporter’s question regarding her review. He did not want to take a position even though he is leaving office. If that’s not fear and cowardice, I don’t know what is.

    About her next review, Wilson said: “There is no reason why there should be anything that’s not positive.”

    I guess the seminar did not cover arrogance.

    Like

Leave a Reply -- you do not have to enter your email address

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.