Does it matter?

June 20, 2015

It is interesting to note that the city has changed the status of the San Jacinto Plaza project.

If is now listed as “matter no. 12-1004-214” whereas before when they listed the item for executive session there was no mention of a matter number.

San Jacinto Plaza Redesign, Solicitation No. 2014-043 (551.071)

San Jacinto Plaza Redesign, Solicitation No. 2014-043; Matter No. 12-1004-214 (551.071)

I believe that designating it as a matter means that the city attorney has now opened a case file on it.

Are they finally taking this seriously?

We deserve better

Brusut


The art of misleading

June 19, 2015

City staff is displaying another way that they mislead council and the public.

This slide was part of a presentation made to city council on June 2, 2015:

spur1966

Notice that the art project to be placed at spur 1966 is scheduled to be completed by September 2015.

That’s good

Well actually it isn’t.

As we wrote in Blue skies under the sun, nothing but blue skies, “At the February 24, 2015 city council meeting we were told that this $500,000 project would be finished and installed at UTEP (spur 1966) in April of 2015.”

utepcloud

The presenter did not bother to tell council that the project was late.  He just reported a different completion date.  If somehow the slide was referring to a different project, then he failed to tell council anything about this one.

Maybe they need the cloud for our monsoon season.

We deserve better

Brutus


Brio explained

June 18, 2015

Several people have asked lately what Brio stands for.

We don’t know if it is an acronym, but there is an actual word brio.

According to the online service available at meriam-webster.com the meaning is:

enthusiastic vigor :  vivacity, verve 

That it is.

Brutus


Sun Metro’s cold hard numbers

June 17, 2015

I wanted to check up on how the Brio service was doing so I went to the Sun Metro web site looking for the  director’s quarterly report to the board (the board members are the city council members).  The last presentation was at the board meeting of April 14, 2015.  Item 12 on the agenda was:

 Presentation and discussion on the Fixed Route Performance Indicators for FY15 2ND QTR for period ending on February 28, 2015.

Unlike their prior quarterly report presentations there was no posting of the report for the public to view.

I decided to look at the national transit database web site.  Sun Metro is required to submit their information to this database.  Unfortunately their 2014 annual reports have not been published yet so I looked at 2013 compared to 2012.

The web site publishes a comprehensive manual that explains what each of their terms means.  One term that required some research was “unlinked trips”.   According to the manual every time a person steps on a bus the unlinked trips number increases by one.  If someone must transfer from one bus to another in order to get to their destination, that would count as two unlinked trips.

How are we doing?

For 2012 sun metro reported that passengers road the busses for 86,715,454 miles.  In 2013 their number was 65,226,810 or roughly a 25% drop.

Unlinked trips in 2012 were reported at 16,655,904 bus boardings compared to 12,710,270 in 2013.  That is about a 24% drop.

In 2012 their operating expense per passenger mile was reported at $.55 and in 2013 it was $.70 or about a 28% increase in cost per mile.

In 2012 their operating expense per unlinked trip was $2.82 and in 2013 it was $3.52.

You don’t need to be a chief performance officer to understand these numbers.

Maybe someone familiar with the situation can explain to us why they had such a dramatic decrease in their ridership numbers.

We deserve better

Brutus


Paying on the never never

June 16, 2015

According to an article in the Times the other day our county hospital has only paid $5.7 million to reduce the principal on the $120 million in bonds issued in 2008.

That’s an average of $814,000 per year over the last 7 years.  At this rate it will take another 140 years to retire the bonds.

That obviously cannot be the plan.  They must be planning to increase the principal payments at some point.  The question is what that will do to our property taxes.

According to the article we have paid almost $42 million in interest and only about $6 million toward principal.

Commissioners court

We don’t get to elect the hospital board or the CEO of the hospital.

Our elected county commissioners court has responsibility for the hospital budget and bonded indebtedness.

They either have not been paying attention or they have decided to stick it to us in the future.

It looks like our only option here is at the voting booth.

We deserve better

Brutus