Could it be that the people behind the bond issue at EPISD really don’t think that the bonds will be approved tomorrow?
Are they planning to do a two step with a subsequent second attempt like the Ysleta district did?
Could failure of this bond issue become their excuse to make sweeping changes at the district?
Is it possible that they will work to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse?
Am I getting carried away?
We deserve better
Brutus
 | Anonymous on Close, but no cigar |
 | Shoefly on So much for heritage |
 | Dan Wever on EPISD disappoints again |
| Anonymous on Close, but no cigar |
| Disgusted on Close, but no cigar |
| People Are Clueless on Close, but no cigar |
| Anonymous on EPISD disappoints again |
| Dan Wever on EPISD disappoints again |
 | frater jason on So much for heritage |
| Anonymous on So much for heritage |
| Huh?! on EPISD disappoints again |
| Anonymous on EPISD disappoints again |
 | John Hogan on EPISD disappoints again |
| John Hogan on EPISD disappoints again |
| John Hogan on EPISD disappoints again |
Interesting.
I do not know anyone who is voting for the bond issue. However, there are more uninformed people in this city than informed people. So you never know………
LikeLike
Brutus, lay off the peyote.
LikeLike
Maybe their real plan all along was to throw this big number out with the real idea being that when they come back with a second one for ONLY $500 million {interest would still make it nearly a billion}, the voters will think it’s a deal and the second one will pass with flying colors.
LikeLike
Brutus YOU ARE GETTING CARRIED AWAY, CAN YOU STILL HEAR ME? 🙂
LikeLike