Could it be that the people behind the bond issue at EPISD really don’t think that the bonds will be approved tomorrow?
Are they planning to do a two step with a subsequent second attempt like the Ysleta district did?
Could failure of this bond issue become their excuse to make sweeping changes at the district?
Is it possible that they will work to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse?
Am I getting carried away?
We deserve better
Brutus
 | JerryK on Setting us up for failure |
| good governance oxym… on Setting us up for failure |
| not so fast on Setting us up for failure |
| good governance oxym… on Setting us up for failure |
 | Anonymous on Setting us up for failure |
 | Helen Marshall on Developers have special n… |
 | John G Dungan Sr on Setting us up for failure |
| City Watcher on Developers have special n… |
| City Watcher on Developers have special n… |
| Anonymous on Developers have special n… |
 | Tom Busch on Developers have special n… |
| Tickedofftaxpayer on Developers have special n… |
| Anonymous on Developers have special n… |
| good governance oxym… on Developers have special n… |
| good governance oxym… on Developers have special n… |
Interesting.
I do not know anyone who is voting for the bond issue. However, there are more uninformed people in this city than informed people. So you never know………
LikeLike
Brutus, lay off the peyote.
LikeLike
Maybe their real plan all along was to throw this big number out with the real idea being that when they come back with a second one for ONLY $500 million {interest would still make it nearly a billion}, the voters will think it’s a deal and the second one will pass with flying colors.
LikeLike
Brutus YOU ARE GETTING CARRIED AWAY, CAN YOU STILL HEAR ME? 🙂
LikeLike