The December 16, 2013 Times editorial urged the approval of a transportation plan. Again the Times advocates higher local taxes instead of more effective representation at the state and feral levels.
El Pasoans are being taxed to pay for facilities that should be paid for by the state and the Times recognizes the situation. From the Times editorial:
No one likes to pay additional taxes or fees. And in this case, it can be justifiably argued that El Paso County vehicle owners are getting stuck with a tab that should be picked up by other governments.
But El Paso has serious traffic congestion issues that are getting worse by the day. That leaves local leadership with two choices — complaining about the failure of others, or taking control of our own destiny.
Whining is not much of a strategy. The results of the bold but controversial choice made by Commissioners Court will become evident today, as the 16 mobility projects are outlined at the Commissioners Court meeting.
Border administration
This year El Paso’s city council voted to create a fund with our local money to pay overtime for U. S. government employees in an effort to improve bridge crossing times. Many parts of our country suffer from river flooding and hurricanes regularly and get extraordinary assistance from the feds, yet somehow immigration has become a feral issue but needs to be paid for by local citizens.
Even university systems
The separately funded Texas Tech system leased our train station for one dollar a year from the benevolent citizens of El Paso. That was in addition to the Albert Fall mansion that we rebuilt with city funds and then gave to the university for another dollar a year.
Go local
If we have to raise taxes, can’t we at least spend the money on something that we are clearly responsible for — like local roads?
We deserve better
Brutus
Posted by Brutus
You must be logged in to post a comment.