Runoff support started

May 13, 2013

A businessman forced a city council member into a runoff according to this propaganda piece from the El Paso Times.  Calling it a news article strains my ability to be civil.

The facts are that the businessman had well over 50% of the early voting.  That was enough to get him elected.  The city council member improved his standing with the election day vote.  He forced the businessman into a runoff.

That is unless you take the view that the city council member was supposed to win and the upstart businessman disrupted the Times ordained result.  The word writer is more appropriate than reporter in this case.

She wrote of the council member  “(he)  has argued that voters supported the ballpark and its location through the November 2012 vote that designated the ballpark as a venue and authorized the use of hotel occupancy tax dollars to finance it.”

Yes he has argued that, just like a lawyer  is paid to make an argument that he knows not to be true.

This October 27. 2012 Times article by the same writer had the title:

El Paso Mayor John Cook: ‘No’ vote on stadium bond means El Pasoans will pay, not visitors

The writer dutifully quoted our mayor as saying “We are asking voters to approve a way to pay for the ballpark and not whether the city should build it.”

The writer knew the argument was a false one, she herself documented the proof.  Yet she did what she could to further the lie.

This link to the definition of integrity might help her.

Muckraker

 


Short memory? or something else?

May 6, 2013

I appreciate the El Paso Times pointing out how our current city councilman who is running for mayor has changed his tune about receiving campaign contributions from the group behind the baseball franchise.

The article said:

In January, Ortega said he would not accept contributions from them.

“On the heels of the ballpark issue, it’s more appropriate for me not to accept money from the ownership group, nor have they offered,” he (Ortega) said.

Then they quoted the candidate again:

On Friday, Ortega said, “I welcome their support that they believe in community and future.”

Whatever that means.  We don’t know if that was a misquote or just not a good sentence.

What we do know is that he has accepted money from the people he said he would not take money from.

What we do not know is how much money.  The Times did not report that.  The actual numbers will probably not come out until after the election since the report will not be due until then.

By waiting until late in the campaign to make their contributions they were able to avoid public disclosure of the actual  amounts until later.

What portion of what this person says should we believe?


Headlines and head liars

May 4, 2013

Recently the El Paso Times has printed articles implying through their headlines that two local candidates for elected office had done something wrong.  Actually in one case the implication was that he might do something wrong in the future.

The headlines were negative and the stories were too, until you turned the page.  Then the reporters told the rest of the story and the reader could see that nothing was amiss.

This of course is a form of political assassination that the Times is performing either for it’s masters or to further it’s editorial policies.

Then on Friday’s (May 3, 2013) the Times front page headline actually lied.  Not kind of, actually.

It read:

“IN 2014, THE CITY WILL WELCOME THE TRIPLE-A EL PASO ____________________.  THE NAME IS UP TO YOU.”

The article told us that the team owners are encouraging fans to enter ideas for the team’s name and mascot on a web site or through the mail.  Top names will be selected and we will be able to vote.

The reporter then tells us “The team’s owners will ultimately decide the winning name …”.

That makes sense to me.  The owners should decide the name.

What I don’t like here is that the headline told us that we get to decide the name.  How does this happen?  Does the reporter not respect his written word?  Did a headline writer mess this up?  Was there an editor involved?

There is of course good news in this.  Someone is asking the voters for their opinion.  It seems that the franchise owners are smart enough to understand their relationship with their customers.  It’s a pity that the city does not get this.

Muckracker


We’ed be better off

May 3, 2013

I have been thinking about what we can expect if our city representative who has reached her term limit is successful and gets elected to the El Paso Independent School District board.  Then The El Paso Times endorsed her candidacy  saying she “… repeatedly demonstrates her desire to get into the weeds …”.

Why anyone would want to run when the Texas Education Commissioner has announced that his own group of managers will manage the district not the board members that the public elects is beyond me.  Let’s say she does get elected and her board gets control back.

This scenario obviously is fictional, it has not happened.  For the sake of readability let’s call her Ms. Aviary:

Ms. Aviary reports breathlessly to her school board that the National Tumbleweed Contest does not have a venue anymore.  It is true that no other city wants to host the event but this gives El Paso a once in a lifetime opportunity to change the quality of life of her citizens.

We need a major league site where tumbleweed growers can come and show us what they can do.  We also need a sponsor.

We don’t have much time.  We will need a manager who will have the authority to bulldoze all obstacles and ignore everyone who objects.  Competitive bidding and transparency will take too much time.  She will need to have a lot of power and an important name.  Ms. Aviary  suggests Tumble Weed Institutional  Tyrant Comprehensive Head (TWITCH).

Luck is with us though.  The selfless businessmen that own the Border Irrigation Group (BIG) that supplies sprinkler systems to growers and the Southwest Tumbleweed Unified Feeding Facility (STUFF) that makes specialized fertilizer for tumbleweeds have offered to buy the sponsorship of the National Tumbleweed Contest and bring it to El Paso.  The only problem is that they need a venue now.  Tumbleweed growing must occur before the summer.  You know what happens to them once they die.

We are so fortunate.  How could these two firms possibly benefit other than by having the joy of seeing El Paso get itself teary eyed?

We must act now.  Where can we find the venue?

Ms. Aviary has the answer.  Boy are we lucky to have her representing us!  She tells us that there is no time to study the market and buy up property.  We must use something we already have.  Austin High School!  That is the perfect venue.  Yes it is a little small, but we could engineer the planting to be more intimate.  Maybe we could graft some plants, we certainly know a lot about graft here in El Paso.   If need be we could cut a deal with the railroad to get the event  on track.

What about the children, you ask?  Once again Ms. Aviary has a plan.  Move the children.  We will have to be flexible.  She tells us that we have all of those yellow school buses that are only used at the beginning and end of the school day.  What we can do is to put one classroom in each school bus.  Where will we park the buses?  Simple again, don’t park them — drive them around town as the teacher conducts the class.

What about gym class and band and orchestra where being in a moving bus might be dangerous?  That’s where the railroad comes in, Ms. Aviary tells us.  We can rent surplus box cars and place them in those unused bicycle lanes all around town.  We will have to pay the price though, surplus box car renting is expensive if you do it this way.

How will we pay for this?  Well first, Ms. Aviary says, it won’t cost much at all.  We already own the campus and the buses so it should only cost about 50 cents to build the venue and about 30 cents to move those kids around.

As luck would have it we can use our powers to get someone else to pay a large part of the 50 cents so that it does not have to come out of our pockets.  We can charge the allergists in town a fee based on the number of cases they treat.  The tumbleweeds will help drive up revenue.  She thought about taxing antihistamines but wanted something progressive.

The El Paso Times  could be a problem though.  What we need to do is to review their transcripts and make them all “A” students retroactively.  They still won’t know how to think independently, ask thoughtful questions, or do much other than print what we tell them to,  but at least they won’t be representing the citizens.

The times interviews Ms. Aviary  and prints this quotation from her. “I’m brilliant and am happy to show those ignorant voters and crazy taxpayers how to improve their lives, it’s nothing to sneeze at really.”

Just wait and see.

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty

Cato


HOT, but getting colder

April 30, 2013

An alert reader contacted me about Economic decline hurts El Paso airport an article in The El Paso Times.

According to the article airport traffic is down 15 percent since 2010 and there is fear that if the Wright Amendment expires in October 2014 as it is expected to things will get worse.

El Paso benefited because the Wright Amendment required that Southwest Airlines stop over in a Texas city like El Paso for some long flights that could have been non-stop.

The article also explained that the tax our airport charges airlines for each passenger is “well below the national average” and that “officials” (whoever they are) want to increase incentives from us to the airlines.

Low taxes and incentives?  I guess that we are not all that attractive without a little lipstick.

From the standpoint of economic growth losing flights will hurt our ability to attract new businesses to the area.  Transplanted executives often enjoy getting out of town to enjoy what they consider to be a better quality of life.

Now to the point

Remember the Hotel Occupancy Tax increase that the voters approved to pay for most of the ball park?  The deal was that the taxpayers would pay whatever portion of the costs that the tax increase could not cover.

Now we learn that “officials” have known that our airport traffic is declining.  They knew it when they told us that they could get someone else to pay for the ball park.  We were told that council was going to build the ball park and tear down city hall regardless of how we voted.

Now another deception is exposed.

Get out your wallet.

We deserve better

Brutus