This might help us.

May 7, 2020

This came in from Max Grossman:

Dear Media and Friends,
I am pleased to announce that Aaron Montes, who announced yesterday that he left the El Paso Times, is planning to run for City Representative of District 7. After a distinguished career in journalism for all three local newspapers, Aaron is ready to lead his district in an effort to make his City a better place. I cannot think of anyone more qualified for the position!
His opponent will be incumbent Henry Rivera, who made the front page of the El Paso Times yesterday for his expletives directed against a citizen during public comment. I will have a lot more to say about him and his record in the coming days and weeks.
Aaron will make his official announcement on his Facebook page on Monday at 1:00pm.
I am making this announcement with his permission.
Get excited!
We deserve better

Less for more

May 6, 2020

This came in from an alert reader:
I am forwarding this article I read in the El Paso, Inc.  I note that when the recycling was cut to every two weeks, Director Smyth said it would save the city $2 million.  But, if we are paying $600,000 to $700,000 how is it saving the city $2 million?  She said it was because the drivers and trucks would not be used as much.  Mrs. Smyth said that each truck the city buys costs $300,000 but, she did not list what the drivers pay was.  Looking at the trucks that pick up my trash, I seriously doubt that the city is buying trucks every year.
Ms. Smyth evidently said that the city would save $2 million, not the customers 😦
We deserve better

What do the workers think?

May 5, 2020

This came from a recent Forbes article:

A recent Harvard Business Review article offering leadership advice to CEOs and executives recommended, “If you are doing cutbacks to save job losses, you must lead by example and do cutbacks that impact your own day-to-day as well. If you don’t, there is a danger that your staff will feel like saps, doing sacrifices while the C-suite continues unaffected. Get a commitment for a pay cut from your senior leaders. As CEO, you should take the largest salary cut yourself.” This sounds so obvious, but it rarely—if ever—happens.

We deserve better


Fact checking the mayor?

May 4, 2020

This came in from Max Grossman:

Dear Friends,
This past November 3, ABC-7 XTRA aired a discussion between Texas preservationist J. P. Bryan and Mayor Dee Margo over the “Arena” controversy. The following day I shared the KVIA video link to the debate and did my best to refute the errors and misinformation coming from Mr. Margo (below) while providing the attached documentation.
Mr. Bryan subsequently produced a video with the help of a professional firm, refuting point by point each of the Mayor’s false assertions.
Last night, Stephanie Valle and Erik Elken of KVIA channel 7 narrated a report announcing that Mr. Bryan has purchased nearly a half-hour of prime time on KVIA, scheduled for this coming Saturday at 6:30pm, during which he will air his video in its entirety and without commercial interruption!
The Mayor responded to the news about Mr. Bryan’s video by accusing him of “politicizing a pandemic.”
I invite everyone to tune in this Saturday and learn the truth.
We deserve better

One teacher’s thoughts

May 3, 2020

This came in from Xavier Miranda:

Good Afternoon Brutus,

For your consideration:
Just a few thoughts on the impact of COVID-19 on our local education system:
The pandemic has revealed how corporate influence on our education system has sorely failed our students. Rather than relying on the expertise of educators, who best know the individual needs of our students, district administrators have been scrambling to replace their experimental technology initiatives that have little pedagogical value. (Prior to the outbreak, our superintendent had already spent $119 million on curriculum initiatives that have proven to be ineffective.)
GIven current circumstances, standards for mastery of content have been lowered, stifling our kids’ creativity and critical analysis, while favoring a one-size-fits-all curriculum.
Consider the following before the imminent transition of our education system to online learning:
1. Students are now limited in their interaction with their teachers, e.g., high school students now see their teachers two to three times a week for an average of 15 minutes per session. The one-on-one exchanges are now minimal, at best. (Our student to teacher ratios are typically 25 to 1; with class loads of thirty-five not uncommon.)
2. Families in areas such as the economically-disadvantaged Chamizal neighborhood, have limited access to WIFI, despite attempts to provide hotspots and laptops. Even when communication companies offer “free” service, such efforts entail having to commit to 1-2 year contracts that are a financial burden for struggling families.
3. In households with multiple children, access to online learning is limited by the bandwidth available. Time and coursework management is left to individual students that already need nurturing in terms of emotional development and skills acquisition.
4. Students designated as Special Education (SPED), Limited English Proficiency (LEP), and Economically Disadvantaged, are the ones bearing the brunt of the transition. Services typically rendered these kids have been restricted, leaving their parents to provide support of which they may not be aptly prepared.
No doubt there will be a push to empower online charter schools, and gradually close public schools after this pandemic runs its course.
Perhaps we need to acknowledge the hypocrisy of current initiatives that claim to address inequities, when in fact, these merely perpetuate them.
This is quite evident in the morass that our healthcare system is in, as a result of similar neoliberal influence on their management and operations.
One can merely look to the lack of coordination of resources, and shortages of PPE and ventilators as examples of a failed business approach to a social service.
Parents, students, and teachers must be included in the design of a post-pandemic education system, rather than those that dismiss notions of civically engaged and critical thinking students.
There are quite a few teachers that are devoted to serving our children, and are eager to step up to the task.
Xavier Miranda


A few days later he sent this in as an addendum:

Good Afternoon Brutus,

I just wanted to follow up with the following development, and I am wondering if you can include it with my original submission:
The potential layoff of 275,000 teachers looms large; and it doesn’t bode well that our EPISD superintendent is a signatory on the plea to Congress
This pandemic will be the excuse to further decimate our public education system, and lead to more “radical reform,” which really means privatization. Our children will be the ones exploited.
It is essential that we all step up and restore the integrity and purpose of our schools.
We deserve better

%d bloggers like this: