The El Paso Times has known about the firing of the deputy city manager that we read about in Bridge to nowhere since at least June 21 of this year.
The Times wrote:
Deputy City Manager Jane Shang was put on paid administrative leave and is working from home on some assignments, according to a city document obtained by the El Paso Times.
Linda Bell Thomas, the city’s Human Resources director, said she could not comment specifically on why Shang was put on leave because it was a personnel matter.
Shang, who was appointed deputy city manager in April 2008, will remain on administrative leave through Dec. 31, Thomas said. Shang had been publicly accused by some council members of not responding to their requests and not working to push through projects they had requested.
Deniability
The Times chose to tell us about the situation as part of an article about our new city manager coming to work.
One would think that the situation deserves it’s own story. Writing what they did in the middle of another article gives the Times the ability to say with a straight face that they covered the story.
Really?
Here we have a city employee one rank below city manager who got in a dustup with city council and in the process contradicted what the former city manager said before council. She has been sent home but is still being paid. In fact she will stay home and get paid through December 31 of this year, more than six months. After that she will stay on the city payroll until April 15, 2015 while using her accumulated vacation and sick time. At that point she will cease to be employed by the city.
We might rightly suspect that she is being kept on the payroll to let her earn more tenure in the city’s pension system. Then again that might not be the reason.
Is she being paid to keep quiet? Is she getting preferential treatment because of who she knows? Is the city afraid of what she might say?
Either way this is certainly not the way taxpayer money should be spent. The city has agreed to firing her in such a way that she will be paid out of the city pension fund for the rest of her life. That’s after she has been fired. Why?
Someone at the Times thought enough of the issue to obtain documentation. Then the story appears buried inside another article. Has management at the Times stepped in and thwarted the reporter?
We deserve better
Brutus
You must be logged in to post a comment.