Trying to shift the blame

February 25, 2014

The commotion over the mistakenly sent email that disclosed that EPISD is considering closing some schools is telling us a lot about our new superintendent of schools.

Alex Hinojosa wrote  in an El Paso Times article:

When the email was mistakenly sent to the news media, district officials asked news outlets to not move forward with the story, with the promise that Cabrera [the superintendent]  would speak with them.

Cabrera said he changed his mind about meeting with news outlets Wednesday. Instead, the district sent out a news release Thursday explaining that the details of the email were part of brainstorming sessions to explore cost-saving options.

“I changed my mind because as I thought about it more and more, I thought it wasn’t fair to print a story that was a brainstorming session,” Cabrera said. “I thought it was unprofessional to do a story based on brainstorming notes.”

Unprofessional

KFOX received the mistakenly sent email.  The district asked KFOX to sit on it until the superintendent spoke with them.  KFOX complied with the request to hold off.  The superintendent renigged.  Then the district tried to make KFOX look like the bad guys.

It is our superintendent that has been unprofessional here.  This adds to the stories I am hearing that he does not return phone calls and cancels in person meetings while the parties are sitting in his waiting room.

Speaking of professionalism, personally I’d like to see him wearing a coat and tie when he is conducting our school district business.

Public information officer

As for the district public information officer who accidentally sent the email, there are some mistakes that you just should not make.  This is one of them.

We deserve better

Brutus


Impact fees

February 24, 2014

Refuse the Juice makes good points when talking about the increases in impact fees that the city is considering through it’s water utility.  Their article included:

Do remember that every other utility bears the cost of adding rate payers to their system.  Electricity, gas and cable come to mind immediately.  They will gladly extend their services into new neighborhoods because they know the new rate payers will more than pay for growth – they understand the concept of economies of scale.  Think about that in this argument as it goes forward.  The city wants to charge you $3,000 to get on their water system.  Cable, gas and electricity = $0.00.   Somebody has their math wrong or is fibbing a little.

Privately owned companies are willing to connect new users for free, but the city owned water utility charges thousands of dollars to connect each new home to their water and sewer systems.

This is nothing other than another tax.  We already have the 4th highest tax among the 50 largest cities in the country.

We deserve better

Brutus


Unnecessary change

February 23, 2014

According to this article the officials at Fort Bliss are about to rename Robert E. Lee road.  The new name will be Buffalo Soldier Road.

The buffalo soldiers were a significant part of our local history and certainly deserve to have things named in their honor.

My problem here is that we could have named some significant new road or facility after the buffalo soldiers instead of changing the name of something already named.

Money is being wasted as addresses have to be changed.  History is being lost since past references to the old name will not be easy to follow in the future.

One fear is that this is revisionism at work.

We deserve better

Brutus


The swing is to KEPO 690

February 22, 2014

The old business card below made it’s way to me recently.

kepo

Notice the five digit telephone numbers.

The radio station transmitted at the 690 megahertz frequency.  KEPO was an ABC affiliate.  The frequency was later used by KHEY and is now used by KTSM.

This article shed some light on the subject for me.

If you have items like this please send them in to me for publication.

Brutus


Astute comment

February 21, 2014

Reality Checker wrote a comment the other day that no one else commented on.  The original post was about how the city appears to be using almost $3 million from Texas state funding sources to build two pedestrian crossings for our new ball park.

The comment deserves to be promoted to a post so that more readers see it.  It is reprinted below:

You just opened Pandora’s box. I believe the pedestrian crossing was included in the original ballpark budget, which makes the city council’s actions of greater concern.

Here’s what the El Paso Times’ Cindy Ramirez wrote in a Q&A on July 15, 2012:

“A preliminary study by Turner Construction shows design and construction costs of about $39 million; $2 million for a pedestrian crossing; and $2 million to demolish the City Hall and Insights buildings. The $50 million allows some wiggle room in construction, though any surplus would be deposited into the debt service fund to help pay off the construction, used to provide additional parking or deposited into a capital repairs reserve fund for future maintenance.”

They are now using state taxpayer funds which were not originally intended to be a source of funds for this project. This is really pretty simple: the ballpark is more over budget than we even know and that city management, council, and the car salesman are once again engaged in a manipulative shell game to obscure the truth. They are also once again robbing Peter to pay Paul Foster.

The only “wiggle room” in this situation is the wiggle room that is allowing city management, city council, the mayor and the Mountainstar principals to continue to do these things without any personal consequences.

Ms. Ramirez stated on July 15, 2012, that the answers in her Q&A were provided by city officials and the Mountainstar principals. If she were not so busy these days serving as the de facto public relations person for downtown redevelopment, perhaps she could have done some reporting on the disconnect between the July 2012 statement and the actions taken in the February 10 council meeting. Then again, maybe she and the Times chose to ignore the discrepancy and deception.

We deserve better

Brutus

Reply