Xtra! Xtra!

May 22, 2013

I’ve been thinking about how the Times can’t keep it’s editorial position separate from it’s reporting.

We see them using their publication to hurt candidates with front page articles that are political in nature.  We see bias in many of their political and governmental articles. There was a day when we could expect them to keep their opinions confined to the editorial section.

News articles were supposed to be fair and balanced. Maybe what they should do is publish what little fair reporting they can offer on the editorial page.  They could use the rest of their newspaper to spew their opinions and biases. That way we could turn to the single news page and trust that it was accurate and fair.  We could read the rest of the paper for entertainment.

An alternative is that they could publish an extra edition once a month or so.   This edition would have fair reporting.

Unfortunately when I ask people what they think of a particular article in the Times I am hearing “I don’t read the El Paso Times” more and more.

We deserve better

Brutus


What will he do?

May 21, 2013

Many of us say that this election cycle has been about city management, not the city manager.

Incredibly the city manager has taken action that may make the runoff elections about her too.  This article in the El Paso Times explains a lot.  She is requesting a 5% pay raise above what she currently gets paid, which is about $239,000 according to the article.

This puts the city councilman who is in the runoff for mayor in a strange position.  If he endorses the raise he risks angering the 78% of the voters who did not vote for him in the first election.  If he declines then he is biting the hand that feeds him.  What will he do?  We might not find out until after the runoff.  He should be asked.

The timing of this request is remarkable.  “I want to be in good standing at the time the new Mayor and council take office in late June” was the quote attributed to her by the Times.   One might think that the current city council should evaluate her past performance since the new elected officials will know less about her performance.  Then again you might think that the current city council should leave it up to the soon to be elected one since it will be their job to manage her.

To me the self-centered, selfish nature of this request and its timing are unfortunate.

I would hope that city council would consider her request seriously.  I offer some points that they might want to consider also:

Her request for a 5% raise would give her much more than council gave city employees last year.  My recollection is that some city police officers did get a raise last year, but it was around 1.8%.

We have found no evidence that she has called any citizens “crazies” recently.  Then again many e-mails are tied up in an expensive lawsuit against the attorney general of Texas that the city is paying for with our money.

While redevelopment is important to her, the plan to spend the bond money that she recently had presented to council does not provide anything for a new children’s museum or to replace the vital Chelsea swimming pool anytime in the next three years.  You can read more about these issues in Shovel ready.

Her plan to relocate city departments since city hall was going to be torn down displaced citizens from a popular recreation center with city administrators.  So much for quality of life talked about this shameful act.

City purchasing uses buy-boards to avoid competitive bidding.  One particular board that the city has spent millions of dollars through requires that 4% of the money spent be given to Houston school districts, not ours.  See More of Our Money for Houston.

Her $33 million plan to move city hall is now well over $70 million.  $63.9 million and climbing is the last detailed accounting.  We will have to wait for projects to be completed before we will know the total  We were either lied to or management is incompetent.

Since a small piece of land that the ball park will sit on was owned by the railroad the city had to bend over backwards.  Fireworks talked about how the city agreed to close many railroad crossings through town without consulting with the public or other government agencies.  The resulting inconvenience will be massive.

In her haste to build new city facilities much money was wasted.  The saga continues showed us how the city manager forgot her place and how her new office was to be larger than the mayor’s.  More money was wasted when newly remodeled space that was never occupied had to be torn down so that larger offices could be built for the mayor.

Now the city wants to kick the ground lease paying El Paso Independent School District central office off airport land with a resultant cost to the taxpayers of about $40 million while the city gives an out of town university virtually free use of other buildings.  See Plane wrong.

This list could go on much longer.  You get the idea.

Some will say that many of the items above are the result of city council actions.  That is true.  What also is true is that the city manager gets her way with city council and that she is behind what happened in most of the list.

Please do not post a comment about how I hate the city manager.  I do not.  Council has failed in their responsibility to manage her.  The city manager has stepped over the line and actively creates policy when it is her job to implement what council decides.

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.

Cato


Plane wrong

May 21, 2013

I wrote in $40 million conflict about how the El Paso Independent School District may have to tear down it’s central office and build a new one because the land it sits on is owned by the city.

I wandered over to the district web site to see if I could find the results of their discussion.  I was pleasantly surprised to find that the video coverage was available and that there was an index tying the agenda items to the portion of the video involved. You can experience that here.  If you want to see the video of the agenda item click on “Item 10E 5 Item 12”.

No action was called for.  The chief financial officer of the city did not say a word, which was appropriate conduct.

What struck me is that EPISD is paying the city through the airport over $132,000 dollars per year for the lease of the land.  Compare that to the $1 per year leases that the city has given Texas Tech (Union Depot and Fall Mansion).  I don’t understand how the airport and the city can justify kicking the local school district off the land while it gives away land and buildings to a state funded university.

Does the airport need the land?  Can a compromise be reached where the district vacates the portion of the property that is dedicated to the school buses?  Could the administrative building stay where it is?  The voters may not spontaneously give the district $40 million for operating expenses, but it seems certain that if they are forced to  cough up $40 million for a new building that the voters will certainly not want spend even more money on the kids.

As an aside I notice that the district web site has a link that should take us to the voting results of past meetings.  Nothing is posted.  I hope that the temporary managers rectify this.

The city could help us here.  I would rather spend the money on the children and the education food chain.

We deserve better

Brutus


Seeing is believing

May 20, 2013

This is sad.

Our current city councilman who is running for mayor filed two corrections to previous state mandated campaign finance reports on May 16, 2013.  I picked this up from the elpasonews.org web site.  According to the article the candidate under reported $40 thousand in contributions.  You can read the article here.

Actually, it is hard to see.  Not understand, see.  The portion of the document where the contributions are listed uses typeface  that is so small and blurry that even after printing out each sheet and using a magnifying glass it was hard to see.  You can try it yourself.  Scroll down about 10 pages and try to read it.

What is clear to see is in the explanation of correction that is part of an affidavit attached to the amended reports:

“… On May 6th the COH [candidate office holder] identified discrepancies regarding the total contributions and total expenditures previously filed.  Upon further review, the COH identified several bookkeeping errors that led to the unintentional omission of several campaign contributions and expenses.  The COH has since identified the omitted campaign contribution [sic?] and expenditures and included them in this amended Campaign Finance Report.”

Several?

One, two, a few mistakes — I guess that would be human.  Is this the way he proposes to handle our money if we elect him mayor?

Timing

The candidate found the errors on May 6th, five days before the election.  Why did he wait until 5 days after the election before making the legally required corrections?

I note that the other candidate also had to file a correction.  His original report was filed Thursday, May 2, 2013.  His report was filed in person and as we know Thursday is the last day of the week that city hall is open.  The very next day that city hall was open for business was Monday, May 6, 2013 and that was the day his correction was filled.  It consisted of a listing of more expenditures.  Evidently he had already reported all of his contributions as the law requires.  May 6 was five days before the election.

The councilman/candidate saw problems on May 6 and took 10 more days to file the corrections.  He filed his corrections after the election.  I also note that his original report was filed using the new electronic system that the city has so he did not have to sign the incorrect report.

Who?

Who did he leave off his list of contributors?  As I said earlier it is hard to see.  I did find one contribution from a lady that has the same last name as one of the ball team owners.  Go figure!

Times

As of this moment the El Paso Times has chosen not to cover this story.  There was a dearth of news in the Saturday and Sunday issues of the Times this week so the failure to cover the story could not be for lack of space.

We deserve better

Brutus


The “GULP” Syndrome

May 19, 2013

In the El Paso Inc., Sunday morning, word got out as to what is holding up El Paso’s Business and Retirement Growth. This has been know for years but our Mayor and the City Council feel that the growth retardation is from lack of Facilities. Their approach is to spend, spend, spend resulting in higher taxes. They really don’t question why new business don’t want to locate in our fair city. There are plenty fo things to do. Indoors, outdoors etc. Real estate is cheap by comparison to other cities but them they look at the property taxes.

“Gulp”.

The property tax is approaching the house payment. Well, our Progressive council says, “Look at what you get”, “a downtown postage stamp baseball field with outfielders in the street”. (I’m sure someone will use double-decker buses as bootleg bleachers).
Scattered city services though out downtown. Don’t you worry, we’ll build you a new City Hall on the on Asarco land”. Then one read both the local and the national press only to find that our School Districts are riddled with corruption only toping the City and County government for indictments and convictions.

“Gulp”.

“Hey boss, are you out of your mind? “How about San Antonio”? “Las Cruces”? etc. Such a deal, you say. High Taxes, Government corruption. Poor schooling at Premium prices. Where is the line?

The PSB thought is was great deal they were proposing; a Retirement village of 450 acres next to Painted Dunes Golf course. The Developers will flock to get in their bids. Truth is that there were no bids. Mayor John says “times are tough”, “our properties have increased in value”, “they went to Santa Teresa because they like Pecans” etc. Again he won’t look at the facts that our Property taxes are over 2 times that of Austin and the the highest in Texas, 5th highest in the country. And thanks to the Mayor’s largesse to the Baseball owners of the team that no one wanted, (even Stockton Ca. turned them down) our taxes will soon go higher and higher unless we get a New Mayor who knows how to put the brakes on things and to bring businesses and jobs to this community. That ain’t “Stevie Boy”, fortunately. Steve, maybe you should teach school again. Please stay away from contract law. (The railroad land Read the rest of this entry »