2B but not really

April 24, 2013

Special thanks to The El Paso Times.  They chose to partially cover the contentious discussion at city council yesterday about the closing of seven rail road crossings on page 2B today (you can read the article here).  The closings are part of the deal that the city had to make to get the land to build the ball park.  See Train wreck by Brutus.

I have not seen the video yet but the article once again tells us a lot by what it does not say.

Three representatives from the Ysleta Independent School District were concerned about the unintended consequences of the closures and the fact that the school district was not notified.  Two city representatives “stood up” to them and pointed out that they had been holding community meetings for years.  Evidently the representatives feel that the city government can operate without regard for other governments and their agencies in El Paso.  The attitude seems to be “we hold meetings, you need to come bow before us, we have no obligation to reach out to you”.

The closing vote passed by six to two.  Most interesting to me is that the article did not mention the city representative who is running for mayor.  Did he sit back and let other council members carry the ball in this issue where parts of El Paso got sold down the river for the sake of the city hall destruction/ball park deal?  Or did he speak up for the progress that he and his cabal are inflicting on us?

Either way the Times should have told us.  The man is running for the office of mayor.  We have the right to know about his actions on council.  Maybe the reporter got tied up in traffic going to the candidate’s campaign office.

Muckraker


Forgetting your place

April 24, 2013

I wrote this back in December 2012 and forgot to publish it.  I still think it is relevant.

I read the guest column written by one of our city representatives and printed in the El Paso Times Sunday (Dec. 9, 2012).

I agree with much of what she wrote but was taken back by her closing paragraph. She wrote “These negative, personal attacks and unfounded allegations must stop.”

Firstly I wonder who she thinks she is. She works for us. We should tell her what to do, not vice/versa. Evidently she thinks that she is in charge and that of course is a large part of our problem with the current, temporary, city government.

Beyond that, I would like to suggest that the people in city government stop calling us citizens “crazies” and “amateurs” as has recently happened. Our government is founded on citizens who are “amateurs” in government affairs electing our representatives. Most of us think that our elected representatives should be “amateurs” and not professional politicians.

Lastly, it would be more appropriate for the city representative to caution the city staff and the other representatives to be more respectful of the citizens and each other. They have unfortunately been saying disparaging things about each other and the citizens. They are way out of line.

She should clean up her own house and then bite her tongue when wanting to criticize the citizenry.

We deserve better

Brutus


Are you kidding?

April 23, 2013

Just in time for the May elections a task force formed by our city manager will finish four billboards designed to make El Pasoans feel better about their city according to an article on the front page of The El Paso Times.  The message is a teaser, currently it reads “so, it’s good”.

I have a few suggestions that might be more helpful in making us feel better about our city:

Fix our roads

Build more parks and make the existing ones better

Replace the children’s science museum that was recently torn down

Let the voters vote on large financial matters that are discretionary in nature

Have elected officials that are honest and responsible to the citizens

Remind government employees that they work for the public, not vice versa

See to it that we do not have the 5th highest tax rate of America’s largest 100 cities.

I trust that the readers could add many more items to the list of things that would make us feel better about our city.

Billboards?

Actions speak louder than words.  Maybe those people of influence that are on the task force should work toward improving the quality of the citizen’s lives instead of those of their power group.

The group is spending $14,000.  I do not know whose money this is but would not be surprised if it turns out to be taxpayer’s.

Front page?

The El Paso Times saw fit to print an article on their front page about this facade.  Meanwhile the important issue at county commissioner’s court (Opening government) was relegated to the end of an article that was printed on page 3b and was barely discussed at that.

Muckraker


Approved but not read

April 23, 2013

Before our current but temporary city manager came along the mayor signed all contracts where the city was a party.  The mayor could only do that with the approval of city council which meant that the document had to be placed on the public agenda.

Now we see agenda items where the council approves of the concept of a contract and allows the city manager to “execute any and all documents necessary…” without actually seeing the documents.

Why should all of the documents come before council when the city manager would only be fulfilling the instructions of city council?

Well, because things happen.  Scrivener could allow contract language mistakes through the carelessness of the city attorney’s office.  The city manager or staff could interpret their instructions incorrectly.  Someone could try to slip something through.

Some will say that bringing the documents before city council would be a waste of time.  Some would even point out that some council members probably would not read anything that the city manager wants, or that they would not understand what the read even if they did read the document because they are only there to rubber stamp the city manager’s actions.

On the other hand, when the city actually does post a document with the agenda, some alert citizen may notice something and help stop something that should not happen.

We deserve better

Brutus


Serendipity

April 22, 2013

The El Paso Times is not pulling its punches.

Yesterday’s front page said it all.

Mr. Progressive Ortega’s continence dominated the front page, just below the Headlines, Mayoral Election.  Four other minor candidates are sitting in the background listening to his every word. Again just below the photo, Mr. Ortega is mentioned 6 times including his recent support of the Baseball stadium before any of the other candidates are named. Seven candidates were mentioned in 50 words or less before being relegated to page 9A. “Very convenient, my dear Watson“.

Seems the “Ortega for Mayor” and the El Paso Times offices are both at 500 W. Overland, all be it different suites, 250 and 150.  With all the vacancies Downtown, you would think a progressive….Stop with the Sherlock!!

Coincidence?

I’ve said enough. What do you think, Brutus?

M. T. Cicero