Over and out

Our west side city representative for the last ten years is no longer on city council.  Unfortunately we still do not know what happened to the investigation relating to her alleged threatening of a city employee.

If I have my facts straight the Times reported back in October of 2013 that the city representative was being investigated to see if she threatened a city employee who had been instructed to trim a tree on her property.  The tree was evidently obstructing a traffic sign.

We don’t know what the city representative did or did not do, but a serious crime may have been committed.  From the Texas penal code:

Sec. 22.01.  ASSAULT.  (a)  A person commits an offense if the person::

(2) intentionally or knowingly threatens another with imminent bodily injury, including the person’s spouse; or

(3) intentionally or knowingly causes physical contact with another when the person knows or should reasonably believe that the other will regard the contact as offensive or provocative.

(b) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed against:

(1) a person the actor knows is a public servant while the public servant is lawfully discharging an official duty, or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of official power or performance of an official duty as a public servant;

We wrote in Do you know who I am? that:

City Manager Joyce Wilson said all council members have to go through standard investigative procedures when allegations are raised against them.

“They are treated the same as any other citizen.  An investigation takes place and the outcome is referred to the District Attorney,” she said in an email.

The case has been handed over to the Special Investigation Group, a police unit formed to investigate allegations made against public officials.

We learned that her statement was just plain hooey to put it politely.

Then in Two strikes and you’re out as part of the discussion over the firing of a deputy city manager we heard of rumors that the same city representative wanted the employee to be fired.

Charter violation? discussed the possibility that the city representative might have also violated the city charter.  We wrote:

Our city charter says:

Section 5.5 INTERFERENCE WITH PERSONNEL OR ADMINISTRATION.permanent link to this piece of content

Except for the purposes of investigations under Section 3.8 and inquiries, the members of the Council shall deal with City employees who are subject to the direction and supervision of the City Manager solely through the City Manager, and neither the Council nor any of its members shall give orders to any such employee, either publicly or privately. Neither the Council nor any of its members shall in any manner control or demand the appointment or removal of any City employee whom the City Manager is empowered to appoint, but the Council may express its views and fully and freely discuss with the City Manager anything pertaining to appointment and removal of such employees.

In other words a city representative does not have the right to give orders to a city employee “either publicly or privately”.  According to the charter:

“The failure of any officer or employee to comply with this chapter or the violation of one or more of the standards of conduct set forth in this article, which apply to him or her, shall constitute grounds for expulsion, reprimand, removal from office or discharge.”

Then in Private club we pointed out that both the district attorney and mayor appear to have responsibilities here.

We deserve better

Brutus

8 Responses to Over and out

  1. mamboman3's avatar mamboman3 says:

    And there you have just given new meaning to the meritorious actions that are soooooo deserving of the Conquistador Award as well as the ineptitude and audacity of those who decided to grant it to her.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Reality Checker says:

    The El Paso Times recently wrote an editorial tribute to Lilly, praising her contributions and service to the city. Yet, they never did a follow-up regarding Treegate. No surprise there, but the manner in which this was so clearly covered up by so many people leads me to conclude that there was more to this than meets the eye. If it was a simple misunderstanding or if the employee had been at fault, there would have been a big follow-up. Instead, it was swept under the rug and a lot of people were complicit.

    Like

  3. mamboman3's avatar mamboman3 says:

    A couple of questions: Was the employee ever reprimanded, reassigned, or fired to anybody’s knowledge?
    Could a FOIA request get some answers from the DA on the results of the investigation?

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Reality Checker says:

      You must be kidding. This is a “personnel” matter. (wink, wink)

      The employee was probably given a promotion or raise to keep his mouth shut.

      Like

  4. will's avatar will says:

    Brutus, has an article of yours been taken down or an i just getting old ?

    Like

  5. Unknown's avatar Jerry Kurtyka says:

    Justice equals just-for-us in City Hall.

    Like

Leave a reply to Reality Checker Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.