Downtown arena

October 4, 2014

On August 14, 2012 the mayor of El Paso signed ordinance 017849 ordering our 2012 quality of life bond election.  The ordinance outlines the specific projects that were to be proposed and voted on.  From the ordinance:

“… an election shall be held on the 6th day of November 2012, in the city … for the purpose of submitting the following measures:”

“Shall the City Council of the City of El Paso, Texas, be authorized to issue general obligation bonds of the City in the principal amount of $228,250,000 for permanent public improvements and public purposes, to wit:  acquiring, constructing, improving, renovating and equipping new and existing library, museum, cultural and performing arts facilities and improvements, including the acquisition of land and rights-of-way for such projects, and acquiring and installing public art related to and being a part of some or all of the foregoing; such projects to include the following:

Arts & Entertainment

Multipurpose performing arts and entertainment facility located in Downtown El Paso;

Downtown

The ordinance specifically proposes a performing arts and entertainment facility located in Downtown El Paso.  City council has been kind enough to publish maps telling us what they consider to be downtown.

The election was held. The public voted in favor of building the performing arts and entertainment facility.

One little problem

However on May 28, 2013 (7 months after the bond election) the city signed a lease with a baseball team group relating to the new ball park.

Section 15.3(c) reads:

neither City nor any Affiliate of City, shall, directly or indirectly, develop, finance, facilitate or otherwise participate in the development or approval of any other outdoor concert venue in downtown El Paso that is reasonably anticipated to compete with the Ballpark, with the exception of a soccer stadium for a Major League Soccer team.

Concert venue, downtown

It would appear that we could have a conflict.  The city got us to vote for a downtown performing arts facility.  Then they signed a lease prohibiting them to build one.

Will we have to pay the sports group for this?  Will the city just build it’s performing arts center somewhere outside of the downtown area.  Will the performing arts money be “repurposed” to build something different?

Texas law requires that bond money be spent the way the bond ordinance specifies.

The actual signed lease with the sports group is not available on the city’s web site.  The document that I have quoted from was presented to city council as part of the change process when the sports group agreed to pay for any costs above $62 million.

Outdoor

The key word here is outdoor.  The city agreed to not build an outdoor venue.  That will limit our design of the new facility.  It will need to be enclosed in a building.

 

We deserve better

Brutus


Supporting our charities

September 19, 2014

It will probably take a while to count up the money but I am eager to hear what local charities will be the recipients of the profits from the first season of baseball.  El Pasoans supported the team with over 8,000 attendees per game.

The team ownership went on record telling us that their profits would be donated to local charities back when the whole ball park issue was being sold to us.  This article in El Paso, Inc. told us “During the controversy over the plan to demolish City Hall to make way for the stadium, MountainStar Sports agreed to raise the city’s return on the stadium and to donate any profits it receives to local charities.”

We might reasonably expect that their first year expenses were higher than what will be normal.  There is no provision in their contract with the city to allow us to audit their books.  That’s the city’s fault.  I’m not saying that the owners will lie to us.  Quite to the contrary I expect that they will be honorable.

Let’s hope to see great benefit to our local charities.

We should not expect however what our former city representative and candidate for mayor told us to expect.  The El Paso Times  wrote this in an article:

“Both families understand that quality of life is part of the equation to making El Paso more competitive for jobs,” Ortega said, adding that the group has pledged the first 10 years of revenues to local charities.

Of course he was in office at the time so we should expect that he would not distinguish between profit and revenue.

We deserve better

Brutus

 


EL PASO — GAME’S OVER #5 — What Do We Do Now?

September 16, 2014

This from Jerry Kurtyka:

EL PASO – GAME’S OVER

# 5 – What Do We Do Now?

Things are going to slide, slide in all directions

Won’t be nothing

Nothing you can measure anymore…

              • Leonard Cohen, The Future

If Brutus continues to indulge me, I want to discuss some ideas that have been brewing over the last three years as I completed the broad band project (BTOP) for the Library. I said earlier that I would redeem the cheap shot I took at Richard Florida’s expense, because he does have something to say on this matter. To paraphrase Florida, urban planners assume that, to attract talent/jobs, what’s important is to provide infrastructure: sports stadiums, freeways, shopping centers, etc. In fact, creative people prefer authenticity — so making your city just like everyplace else is a sure way to kill its attractiveness.

Sound familiar? Stadiums, trolleys, arenas. Since my arriving here in 1996, El Paso’s main problem to me, at least, has been its insularity, backwardness and apathy, not the lack of a trolley or arena. You know the joke, “You have landed in El Paso, please set your watch to 1974.” Few ever leave and even fewer people travel to return and tell us what the rest of the world is doing and thinking. When they do, we call them “crazies.” Otherwise, it’s the same people talking to the same people.

I really believe that El Paso and many other cities are now at a crossroad. It is clear that global urbanization will continue if for no other reason than cities are an efficient form of social and economic organization. When I wrote earlier about El Paso’s physical and economic growth, that is what I was talking about and it is the focus of our city leaders and the Borderplex types. It is all they can see and so they put all their effort into it. They want to do the things other cities tried 25 years ago.

It is also clear to me that the world is in the midst of a change in consciousness as radical as previous changes in the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution of 200 years ago. These two trends – global urbanization and emerging consciousness – are not necessarily mutually reinforcing, either. There is an unrest afoot on the planet. If you’re not seeing it and feeling it, you are blind.

All over the world now, action communities are forming faster than they can be counted, usually focused on social and economic justice, peace and the environment. Tens of thousands of them! They have no central governance and only informal communication between them and no central dogma. Dogma and “isms” are so 20th century! They don’t want to kill each other. OCCUPY is one such group in this country, but more frequently these action groups involve indigenous peoples in the 3rd world and, especially, in South America. It is the consciousness of the planet speaking to us through the planet’s marginalized people. It is worth being a part of it.

Listen to this five minute speech given by Paul Hawken at the Bioneers Conference (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xkz2OjMOg88 ) to hear what I mean. Now, imagine this unrest here in El Paso. Where are its seeds? Who would you ask about it?

First I will tell you who NOT to ask. Do not ask anyone in the Rotary Club, the Garden Club, the country club, Borderplex, or anyone on city council or in any bank or economics or planning department or the chambers. They are too baked into the current growth model and how to get their piece of it.

But you can ask yourself what matters in your city. What do you feel about your city and, also, notice where in your physical body you feel it: stomach, neck, head, heart, ears? When do you feel it? Who in you is feeling it? The teenager? The business person? The teacher? The parent? The taxpayer? The malcontent? What information is this giving to you; telling you about El Paso and your place in it? Are you going to do anything about it?

When I consider El Paso, I feel very angry and I want to do something about it instead of just watching the Usual Suspects feed their faces at the spend-and-tax trough, courtesy of the politicians and bureaucrats they own. I also get upset with the apathy of citizens here that enables this to exist as it does.

So, when I left city employment last year, we took a European tour and exactly one year ago I found myself attending the Urban Systems Collaborative (USC) conference at Imperial College in London (so I could write off the trip ). The USC focuses on the role played by information flows in cities and attempts to define a “science of cities” using constructs such as complex systems and social network theory. I had participated in this eclectic, hang-loose-group for a year and looked forward to finally meeting some of the people with whom I had been corresponding – urbanists; architects; computer scientists; physicists; academics; artists (yes); entrepreneurs; planners. Quite a mix!

Appropriately, the USC conference theme was Quality of Life, but it wasn’t about a bond issue. Rather it was about what makes for a quality life in the city; how it is that our cities can become the places that contain our lives and allow each of us to reach our potential. I will get into more specifics in future posts, if Brutus allows, and I will consider how Maslow’s Hierarchy can help to define an urban consciousness and point the way up and through to different kinds of cities that coexist simultaneously in the same space; with or without trolleys and stadiums.

NEXT – Maslowpolis (A Consciousness of Cities)


Successful opening season

September 12, 2014

Our first season of AAA baseball season is over and it was a grand success.

This part of the result is pleasing.  We have a wonderful award winning ball park, the public is supporting the team with attendance, and we will get to host a AAA national championship game in the fall of 2015.

The disgrace of tearing down city hall and the costs of replacing it are another story.

We should be happy that the season has been successful.  Otherwise it would have cost us more money.

Team management is telling us that the problems of finishing construction and getting into operation understandably occupied most of their time this first season.  They tell us that they plan to do more promotion and development for the next season and we should see even greater attendance numbers.

Good for us.

Well, not actually.  As I wrote in Porking, “I mentioned earlier that the city will get 50% of the parking fees, kind of.  Actually there will be a revenue cap and the city will only be able to collect up to $655,000 per year “from the aggregate of the Ticket Fees, the Parking Fees and the Split Revenues” in the first five calendar years.”

Let’s hope for continued success.  It’s a shame we won’t benefit financially.

We deserve better

Brutus

 


Fourth time’s the charm

September 9, 2014

The machine just will not stop.

Three or four previous attempts have been made to fund and build a platform over the depressed train way downtown that leads to the new ball park.

In one attempt the former city manager tried to fund it with quality of life bond money.  In another city staff tried to swap money with the state, using state money to build the pedestrian walkway and giving the state an equal amount of money for the state to beautify bridges crossing I-10.  There was also talk of using ball park money to build the walkway.

In the case of the proposed swap of money with the state we saw a deputy city manager tell us that the project was related to the ball park.  The former city manager stepped in and said that was not true.  The deputy city manager was sent home to retire on our nickel.

At the Tuesday, September 2, 2014 city council meeting the project was finally approved.  The Times reported that neither quality of life money nor ball park money is to be used.

Take comfort in the fact that none of the Apollo space program money and none of the national parks money will be used either.

Unfortunately local money will be used.

The presentation by city staff told us that the funding source was agreed upon in the Tuesday, February 11, 2014 city council meeting.

At the February 11 meeting the backup material for the agenda item stated “Costs will be allocated based on 80% Federal funding and 20% Local Government funding until the Federal funding reaches the maximum obligated amount.  The Local Government will then be responsible for 100% of the costs.”  The documentation also told us that the local matching funds could be Transportation Development Credits.

Credits

These credits could have been applied to other street projects.  City council voted to spend our credits on the ball park, not on our local streets.

Why?

The ball park operated with record attendance this season.  No platform was in place, nor was one evidently needed.  Had there been a pedestrian congestion problem rest assured that the city would have temporarily closed part of the adjacent street to vehicle traffic thus creating a giant sidewalk.  Why do we need to build this complicated platform over a depressed train way?

More to come

Curiously the September 2 presentation by city staff asked for approval to spend $2,085,000 from the feral funding.  The slide used to explain the request also showed “TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES NOT TO EXCEED $2,338,745”.

Evidently they are not done with us yet.

We deserve better

Brutus