Appraisal uprisal

May 17, 2013

Commercial property owners in town have just received their new valuations from the Central Appraisal District.

Many have seen increases of 200 to 240% from last year to this.  If all property in the area went up by the same percentage our individual taxes would remain essentially flat.

Unfortunately that will not be the case.  The district seems to have a policy of raising values indiscriminately and waiting for the property owner to protest.  We know that they do not actually do an appraisal.  They simply place a value on the property with the hope that it will hold.  If you keep quiet you lose.

I have heard many horror stories from property owners who went to the district to protest valuations themselves.  If you have never been through this be prepared for an incredibly unfair journey.  Staff will set you up for failure at your hearing.  When you are at the hearing and learn what you should have done to prepare you will be told that you have already had your chance.  Better luck next time.

You should protest.  You should be prepared.  Talk with someone who has been through the process successfully.

Another approach is to hire a firm that will handle the protest for you and charge you a percentage of the amount that they save you.  While I do not condemn those people who provide the service, think of the situation.  We have a government agency that is so hard to deal with that you have to hire representation.  I am not talking about complex legal or tax matters.  Every property owner knows that his property is worth and can prove it.

The district is run by a board that is made up of elected officials.  Shame on them.

Our alternative to higher taxes is to go to the district and protest.  If politeness does not work you should demand your rights as a citizen.  Remember the the review board that you will be presenting to is paid by the district.  What is worse is that the district gets to choose who stays on the board and who is let go.

Most of us don’t have a problem paying our fair share.  These people are thugs.

They need to hear from us in person.

We deserve better

Brutus


Spending what they don’t have

May 7, 2013

The El Paso Central Appraisal District increased it’s valuation of our local Western Refining from $280 million to $1.1 billion in one year.

That is simply absurd.

Western refining appealed and fought, ultimately settling at a negotiated value of $320 million.

The district’s board is made up of elected officials from our local governments, including the city and the El Paso Independent School District (EPISD).  The board members should have stepped in, they certainly are in charge.

Now we find out from the city’s chief financial officer. who is also one of the Texas Education Agency  appointed managers of the EPISD, that both governments budgeted to receive the inflated tax income from Western Refining.  It looks like they were off by $11.5 million.  In fairness to the chief financial officer she was not part of the budget process this year at the EPISD,but watch out for next year.

The city will have to cut about $3 million from it’s current budget for the remaining four months left in their fiscal year.

Why?  Any competent manager would have held back on spending because of the probability that the valuation increase would not hold.  Instead she claims that they have spent the money.  The city manager and city council should not have spent money that they did not know for certain that we would receive.

What grade were you in when you learned not to count your chickens before they hatch?

This was done at a time when they have spent over $135 million to move city hall and build a new ball park.  Wait!  They have not actually spent the money yet, they have borrowed it and we will have to pay it back with interest over the next few decades.

The $3 million per year would pay most of the cost of the bonds that were issued to pay for the new ball park.

The city knew this could happen.  They also knew that the number of airport passengers was declining (see HOT, but getting colder)  and that the portion of the ball park financing paid by the hotel occupancy tax would likely not grow at the rate they predicted.

El Paso taxpayers have assumed almost $1 billion in new debt this year while the folks at the city have continued to spend despite knowing that incomes would not match what they told us.

We deserve better

Brutus


Sinking fund

May 2, 2013

I thought I would write about the recent changes in our local situation.

Things we did not get to vote on:

$210 million for streets — city

$152 million for remodeling of the hospital and new clinics — county

$135 million and climbing for building the new ball park and replacing city hall — city

Closing 16 railway crossings throughout the city as part of the ball park deal

Multiple citizen initiative petitions that city council has chosen to either fight in court or deny voting.

Next assaults:

Now it appears that one of our state representatives wants to pass state legislation that would give city council the right to change contributions to the Fire and Police Pension Fund.  Currently changes must be approved by the voters.  Some say that the pension fund shortfall is in excess of $200 million dollars.

Proposition 4 on the upcoming city election we will get to vote on.  If we vote yes we will give up the right to set the salaries of the mayor and council.  Their pay adjustments would be automatic.

We did vote for:

$470 million for quality of life bonds

And interest

Between what we voted for and what we did not, we now have over $967 million in new debt.  Add interest and we are probably around $2 billion further in the hole.

These numbers do not include the costs of operating the new facilities.  We should see that starting to show up in our tax bills next year.

We deserve better

Brutus


Are you kidding?

April 23, 2013

Just in time for the May elections a task force formed by our city manager will finish four billboards designed to make El Pasoans feel better about their city according to an article on the front page of The El Paso Times.  The message is a teaser, currently it reads “so, it’s good”.

I have a few suggestions that might be more helpful in making us feel better about our city:

Fix our roads

Build more parks and make the existing ones better

Replace the children’s science museum that was recently torn down

Let the voters vote on large financial matters that are discretionary in nature

Have elected officials that are honest and responsible to the citizens

Remind government employees that they work for the public, not vice versa

See to it that we do not have the 5th highest tax rate of America’s largest 100 cities.

I trust that the readers could add many more items to the list of things that would make us feel better about our city.

Billboards?

Actions speak louder than words.  Maybe those people of influence that are on the task force should work toward improving the quality of the citizen’s lives instead of those of their power group.

The group is spending $14,000.  I do not know whose money this is but would not be surprised if it turns out to be taxpayer’s.

Front page?

The El Paso Times saw fit to print an article on their front page about this facade.  Meanwhile the important issue at county commissioner’s court (Opening government) was relegated to the end of an article that was printed on page 3b and was barely discussed at that.

Muckraker


Fireworks

April 22, 2013

My good friend M. T. Cicero alerted us to  an article in El Diario the other day.  He used Google translation.  Just getting the article was an eye opener, El Diario will now become a source of news about El Paso for me.

I don’t think it would be fair to quote the article directly since Google was used to convert it to English.  It was in the April 18, 2013 edition if you want to read  it  yourself.

The reporter wrote about city council’s decision to close several streets as part of the ball park deal with the railroad.  Evidently school districts, neighbors, and other agencies were not informed by the city.  Government officials and citizens were interview and some of their concerns were discussed.

The manager of El Paso County Water Improvement District Number One spoke of the 532 water users who would evidently suffer because of these closings.

The Ysleta Independent School District (YISD)  learned of the situation from a third party, not from the city.  Students use the Cadwallader street crossing to go to and from Riverside High School.  YISD held an emergency meeting.  Also some 16-22 buses will have to be re-routed.

We don’t know how many others will be affected by the closings yet.

The article tied the closing of the crossings directly to the construction of the ball park and the parking lot east of the new city hall.  It pointed out that city council will be discussing (and probably taking action) on this next Tuesday at 8:30 AM in the downtown library.

We have been writing here about the closings.  Train wreck was our most recent article about them.

Once again the city is acting with disregard for the public.  It appears that there will be some opposition from other agencies at Tuesday’s meeting.

It’s about time.

One more thing.  According to the reporter the city did not return her calls.  Had it been a call from the city’s media outlet and real estate partner The El Paso Times I suspect the call would have been returned.

Let’s vote for a change and for change in May.

We deserve better

Brutus