Capital Improvements Department

August 12, 2015

This came in from Helen Marshall:

Did you notice that when you tried to look at the San Jacinto Plaza cam, it is managed by “Capital Improvements Department?”  Mr. Gonzalez has axed engineering and created a new department; city council was informed but has not discussed or approved this.  The new department has “reached out” to private corporations HNTB and Freese and Nichols.  Interesting that HNTB has moved its El Paso offices from the Eastside into the Mills Building.  At least the HNTB employees will get a good view of what is not happening at the Plaza in front of the Mills Building….

http://www.elpasoinc.com/news/local_news/article_9d277082-3f7c-11e5-9de9-0bee4b5844ee.html

 


Better, but not much

July 8, 2015

Looking at the numbers in the National Transit Data Base that Sun Metro self reports we can see that bus ridership is up since they introduced the Brio.

In the period from November 2013 through April 2014 Sun Metro had an average of 994,788 people get on a bus each month.

During those same months of 2014 through 2015 the average was 1,048,497.

That means that on average 53,709 more people boarded buses system-wide each month this year than last year.

Previously in Brio ridership numbers  we wrote that according to an article in El Paso, Inc. more than 60,000 people were riding Brio each month.  Those numbers are only 11% off.  Many of us would consider that to be pretty good for a city department.

While the numbers are an improvement, we still have a long way to go.  If we take the number of miles that the buses drive in a month and divide that into the number of people that board the numbers come out to 1.7 new passengers each mile.

Shouldn’t we reconsider the Alameda Brio?  If we feel the need to improve bus service on Alameda couldn’t we do it by adding more traditional buses instead of spending $35 million of city money (not federal)?

We deserve better

Brutus


Are We Ready to Re-Think?

January 5, 2015

This is from Helen Marshall:

Are We Ready to Re-Think?

The El Paso Inc just honored Woody and Josh Hunt, Paul Foster and Alejandra de Vega Foster, and, yes, Joyce Wilson as El Pasoans of the Year for making the baseball team and ballpark happen. The accompanying article asserts: “This year, the revitalization of Downtown that the city and business leaders had been trying to kindle since the 1980s has finally caught fire, evidenced by the new businesses, restaurants, apartment and hotel projects and the excitement.” For example, Joe Gudenrath, executive director of the Downtown Management District, says there was only one more event Downtown this year than last, but 60,000 more people attended.

 

Paul Foster sings Wilson’s praises: “Joyce was an absolute key part of the whole process, and I don’t think it would have happened without her,” Paul Foster told El Paso Inc. “She took a lot of bullets and a lot of criticism. “I think if people had it to do over again, they’d probably rethink some of that criticism. Joyce has great skills, and I think is largely responsible for the success of the whole project.”

And Josh Hunt assures us that “Once it was built, I think we were able to move past some of the more controversial aspects of the process.”

 

The following exchange with Josh Hunt is recorded:

It would be an expensive venture for MountainStar and for El Paso taxpayers if they had to pay all or part of the costs for the new stadium and the infrastructure to serve it. Critics of major league sports investments say the costs far exceed the benefits for a community. What would you say?

I’d say very few of those critics are actually looking at the real numbers and the hard and soft values that come with ventures like this. First, I think El Paso and the borderplex can make this happen through many financial means, and not just taxes. . . Just for instance, the ballpark here was financed significantly through the hotel occupancy tax, which is charged to our visitors. I think there are a lot of those types of financing tools out there. I think there are a lot of other intangibles that need to be looked at, like business recruitment and retention, quality of life, jobs, economic development and broadening our tax base. 

Go look at Denver. . .you can see what transformations have taken place in downtown Denver, which is now one of the most attractive places for young people to live. That started all the way back when they built Coors Field and followed that up with a downtown arena and then followed that up with a football stadium, all 100-percent publicly financed. It’s now one of the most livable downtowns in the country.”

This writer has been to a game, and, yes, it’s good to have baseball in El Paso. But I’m wondering if public confidence in civic leaders has recovered from the discovery that city manager Wilson and her Council allies called those opposed “crazies,” and deliberately schemed to bring about the destruction of City Hall to make way for the ballpark without any public discussion whatsoever. And I am waiting to read the names of all these new businesses and restaurants, and the surveys that identify the baseball team as the reason for building new hotels or apartments, or that identify the baseball team as the reason for attending a Downtown event.

Personally, I look now to see if there is anything happening in the ballpark when I plan to attend something downtown, and either don’t go or go much earlier than I would have planned to (which of course may mean I have to spend money in a restaurant, how clever of them!). I’m also waiting to see some honest accounting of the total expenses for the ballpark and how much is covered by the HOT.

As for public financing of venues in Denver – Denver is not exactly a parallel for El Paso. It is the state capitol, has a median family income of over $57K, and a very different downtown structure….

http://www.elpasoinc.com/news/el_pasoan_of_year/article_e99db9fc-8f79-11e4-9a75-bbd61883e3d2.html


Nor any drop to drink

January 1, 2015

We start off the new year with a post from a new (to us) author Helen Marshall but not until we take the opportunity to wish you a healthy and prosperous new year and to thank all of you for your involvement.

 

What, us worry?

The Times has recently printed a series of articles that described various aspects of the drought facing the region and questions of how to continue supplying adequate water to the city. El Paso Water Utilities has also embarked on a campaign to convince us that, while water supply is not a simple matter any longer, “purified water” – i.e., recycled sewage – along with water piped from Hudspeth County, will ensure “Water Forever” as the EPWU slogan has it.

UTEP Economics professor Tom Fullerton ran a three-pronged offense over the weekend of December 27-18, to reassure everyone that “EPWU has met the challenge of providing quality water services in El Paso’s desert environment while operating efficient, reliable facilities that keep pace with the city’s growth. . [P]rudent management, continued planning, and innovative technologies will yield long-term solutions that benefit the local economy, environment, and quality of life.”

All three local papers printed his column, a first as far as this writer knows. Readers presumably are reassured that El Paso can continue growing, and water will be provided (at a reasonable price, yet!).

While the EPWU has indeed led the way on conservation in Texas and the region, we have yet to hear how much growth we can continue to shove into the Paso del Norte (where the neighboring city uses the same aquifer), regardless of the projected continuing drought. (Fullerton does not address the river that is missing for much of the year as its waters largely disappear into the pecan farms and cotton fields.) How much water is being removed from the aquifers and not returned now? How much worse will this be when we are drinking our “recycled water” rather than using it for recharge? As we carpet the desert with impermeable parking lots and structures, how much worse does the flooding problem become? Perhaps we must just learn to live next to the Big Ditch and not worry about that part of our quality of life. And the good news is that there will be an ever-larger supply of attendees for the Ballpark!

If we buy this story, do we deserve better?

http://www.elpasotimes.com/water

http://www.elpasoinc.com/news/local_news/article_a436c3ca-8f76-11e4-aa76-c3ace90cf2e0.html

http://www.elpasotimes.com/opinion/ci_27217287/el-paso-water-utilities-is-planning-leader

http://diario.mx/Opinion_El_Paso/2014-12-27_521b96a7/epwu-la-eficiencia-en-el-desierto/

 


Council uber all

September 24, 2014

El Paso Inc. wrote in their Monday, September 22, 2014 post (www.elpasoinc.com) that Uber is now operating in El Paso.

Uber is a jitney service where people can use their smart phone to arrange a ride instead of taking a taxi.  Users say that the service is quicker and more convenient than using our traditional taxi companies.

Part of the Inc.  post included this:

“I’m all for it,” said city Rep. Claudia Ordaz, City Council’s newest and youngest member. “I think this is a good opportunity for the city to look at the vehicle-for-hire-regs and maybe revamp them so that services like this can abide by the rules.”

Our city representative says that she’s all for the new service, even though it appears to be illegal to do this in El Paso.

Rules

Many of our elected officials seem to have difficulty remembering that our laws must be obeyed.  If we don’t like them we should change them.  If this service is truly illegal in El Paso, then what she said is irresponsible.  A better response might have been “the City needs to look into how we want to handle this.  I think that I would vote for an ordinance that would allow Uber to operate legally”.

Instead what we saw was a city representative once again deciding that they have the authority to violate or encourage others to violate our laws.

We deserve better

Brutus