Some people at the Ysleta Independent School District (YISD) are evidently considering trying to float a $155 million bond issue this year. From what I can tell this money would be for maintenance and repair of existing facilities.
My thoughts here apply to the other school districts too.
Operating expenses
Repairs and maintenance should be paid out of the annual operating budget as far as I am concerned. State law requires the school district to balance their budget every year. Failure to keep up with maintenance means that they are not paying their bills as they go.
Fancy buildings
We spend too much money on our school buildings — not that we have too many schools, but we spend too much on the ones we build.
Why does each elementary school need to have a unique design? Why do the buildings have to be so fancy? Does that contribute to the quality of education as much as instructional material and teachers?
Pay as we go
Word on the street is that the bond issue would not result in an increase in taxes. That must mean that some old bills are expiring. Why not continue at the old tax rate and save some money, or if necessary spend that money on pay as you go maintenance? Twenty and thirty year bonds end up costing us a multiple of what we issue the bonds for.
Will Ysleta bow to the wishes of the architectural and construction businesses in El Paso or will they think about what is important to our children and teachers?
Ysleta is in an unusual position. I hope that they take the lead and learn to manage the money.
While they are at it, it would be nice if all of the school districts spent less money on their central office staffing and worried more about helping the classroom teacher do her/his job. Teachers having to spend their own money for classroom materials is ridiculous.
We deserve better
Brutus
You must be logged in to post a comment.