Caught again

May 9, 2015

We learned the other day that the fee that city council imposed on our water utility last year will now be assessed to homeowners.

Back in September council imposed the fee on the utility to help balance the city’s budget.  They told the board of the water utility that they wanted “nonresidential” customers to be charged.

A local church made a claim and we are now being told that assessing the fee on only “nonresidential” customers is not legal.

Rebates will evidently be made to the water customers that have already been charged and homeowners will now have to pay part of the bill.

One thing that is unusual here is how quickly the water utility changed course faced with the claim of illegality.  Often local governments fight rather than obey the spirit of a law.

If only charging “nonresidential” customers has proven to be illegal we have to ask why the city attorney did not know this when council took their action.

Then again maybe she did.

Wouldn’t it be nice if council would stop imposing hidden taxes.  The water utility should never have been involved in this issue.

We deserve better

Brutus


Just give us the money

May 8, 2015

I just don’t see how I can vote for a bond issue when the organization publishes a notice like this one:

yisdproject list

I’m not against investing in our schools.  The notice however tells us that we are not voting for a specific list of projects.  Instead we are voting to give the school board money that they can spend any way they want.

We deserve better

Brutus


On their way out the door

May 7, 2015

I don’t know what the right balance is with the teacher contracts but I do know that I don’t want this non-elected board to make decisions that should be left to an elected board.

This from Xavier Miranda:

Morning All,

I am forwarding you excerpted information pertaining to potential changes to our Continuing Contracts by the Board of Managers. Please take note of this as it affects all employees.

Regards,

Xavier Miranda
DEIC Representative
Social Studies Department
Coronado High School

“It is Teacher Appreciation Week.  At what is hopefully the Board of
Manager’s last meeting on Thursday, May 7th, you will get to see how much
the Managers and Administration appreciate you.

The Budget and Compensation Package is being left to the elected Board of Trustees, though
the Managers and Administration have finalized that together.  You will
remain the lowest paid of major districts in El Paso County and far below
the average for the Eight Major Urban Districts in Texas.

The Board of Managers is slated to show their appreciation for you by
voting to radically change the Reduction In Force (RIF) policy for those of
you on Continuing Contracts.  They plan to vote delete the current
DFCA(LOCAL) which contains well founded limits on when a RIF can occur,
under what circumstances, as well as provides real due process and real
opportunities at other positions AND meets the Texas Education Code
21.157.  Current DFCA(LOCAL) limits the causes of RIF to “financial
exigency” or “program change”.

The Board of Managers and Administration will show their appreciation of
you by approving a new and dangerously anti-teacher DFFC(LOCAL).

*Short version:  Those of you on a Continuing Contract will have little
more job security than a Walmart greeter.*

Long version.  The changes include:

1.  The reasons for a RIF are changed to “financial exigency” AND when the
Superintendent “*Determines another need to reduce personnel on Continuing
Contracts.”  *In other words, if he feels like it.

2.  It is worded in such a manner as to allow him to target specific
teachers on specific campuses who have annoyed him or his leadership team.
And remember, one of his Executive Cabinet reportedly said in a meeting,
“If you rock the boat, I’ll throw you overboard.”

3.  Under the new policy, you can be “dismissed” at any time in the year,
not just at year end.

*4.  The net effect is to nullify your Continuing Contract and leave you,
for all practical purposes an “at will employee”.*

Mr. Margo tried to impose this change last year, but the item was
withdrawn.  Over his tenure as a Manager and before in the Legislature in
2011, he has shown disdain and contempt at best towards public school
teachers.  He has twice stated publicly that he wants to “get rid of
teachers who just occupy a chair”.

So, join me Thursday evening at 5:00 watch Administration and Managers show
their appreciation of teachers by further Walmartizing the EPISD.”

p.s.  If you check their Agenda, Teacher Appreciation Week is not on it.
That alone speaks volumes.
——————————

—-
El Paso ISD Non-discrimination disclaimer
http://www.episd.org/employment/disclaimer/20140602.php
“I am EPISD, Excellence Starts With Me”


City ignores state requirements

May 6, 2015

This came in from Helen Marshall yesterday:

The Times reports today that the city election candidates’ financial reports earlier said to be filed late were in fact filed on time electronically; BUT only four of them went on the city clerk’s website on Friday, the day they were supposed to be viewed by the public.  BECAUSE – wait for it – the city clerk’s office is closed on Friday!  And of course, no one could be assigned to come in to work to perform an important electoral function.   One candidate used a committee to raise funds and the city has no way for that committee to file a report electronically – gee, they only had two months to figure that out – and so when the committee went to the clerk’s office on Friday with its paper report to file, they found a closed office.  OK, let’s say they should have realized that no duty would get in the way of Friday closing.   The Deputy City Clerk said that “even though committee reports cannot be submitted electronically at this time, and the city clerk’s office was closed on Friday,technically the committee’s report is still considered late.”   Translation – whoever is to blame for this, it is not the City Clerk’s office, we aren’t giving up our Fridays for anything, get that?

 
 

Brutus

 


Financing paint

May 5, 2015

Looking at the Ysleta Independent School District $451 million bond issue material that the district has on it’s web site I am surprised to see the amount of maintenance expenses they are asking to be funded.

This link should take you to the plan for Bel Air high school.

It seems that they want to spend $12.6 million to repair the school.  An example is the $286,000 that they want to repaint the walls in the main building.  In fact it looks like the entire $12.6 million is to be spent on things that should be on a pay as we go basis.

Financing paint

Good grief.  The next thing we know they will be taking out a loan to buy breakfast.

We deserve better

Brutus