No community input needed

February 22, 2013

Quality of life

In El Paso the citizens are evidently not smart enough to decide what they need.  That is done for us by city staff and city council.

Here is a refreshing example of what other communities do.  This community sends out 10,000 surveys each year (out of a population of about 680,000 voters).  They ask how satisfied the respondent is with:

  • Economic Opportunities
  • Education System
  • Transportation System
  • Local Government Utilities
  • Presence of Local Government in Our Lives
  • Environmental and Natural Resources
  • Government Services
  • Growth Management
  • Racial, Religious and Ethnic Tolerance
  • Security
  • Healthcare
  • Non-government Social Services
  • Entertainment
  • Neighborhood and Family Support
  • Public Parks and Recreation
  • Affordable Housing
  • Historic Preservation
  • The Arts

It’s called a report card.  The local governments use it to focus on what they should be doing to help improve the community.  We don’t need this in El Paso.  The cabal running the city knows what to do for their own enjoyment.

Actually the city did do some of this when promoting the bond issues.  Their idea was to convince us that they wanted our input.  What they got was a survey box that was stuffed by one or more people and/or organizations.  At some point the city knew the results were rigged.  El Paso Inc. reported the story here.  Did city staff know that over 500 of the responses were in the handwriting of one or two individuals?  How could they not know?  They went ahead and used the rigged results to show us what the “people wanted”.

Then we have the Bond Oversight Advisory Committee that the city created to give us the illusion that we would have a say in the administration of the bond funds.

We deserve better

Brutus


Bridge for sale

February 20, 2013

Quality of life

A digital wall.

According to El Paso Inc.  we approved $3 million for a 36 foot long, 5 foot high set of 4 plasma TV’s that will go in our history museum.  I read in The El Paso Times that this would be the first one like it in the United States.  One in Copenhagen attracted 400,000 visitors in its first year.  This one would be interactive and would allow you to touch the screen to get information about the history of El Paso.

Let me venture out to predict the future of El Paso:  this thing will be a maintenance nightmare.

Are we absolutely out of our minds?  The first one in the United States?  Why?  Could it be because the seller of this thing could not find another city dumb enough to buy one?

Let’s see.  We should worry about vandalism, screen life, malfunction, replacement/repair cost and the cost of developing new content to name just a few of the issues.  With our current council we need to worry that they will allocate money to paint it.

Maybe I should jump on the bandwagon and buy a taxi cab to transport some of the 400,000 visitors that will fly into our airport just to see a big TV.  On second thought I decline.

It looks like this is going to happen.  I sincerely hope that I am wrong and that it will be a major success.  Children will grow up and tell their grandchildren about the wonderful experience they had back in 2013, the only year that it was operating.

I do know that spending the money on the library or for parks would be a far more certain way of improving the quality of life for our citizens.

We deserve better

Brutus


Minimal due to condition of building

January 18, 2013

In Pre Sneak Attack I wrote about how city council broke the remodeling of the second floor of the El Paso Times building into two job orders.  The first one they issued without letting us know — it was for $450 thousand to demolish the old improvements.  The second one was for $649 thousand — they had to take it to city council.  The city manager called obeying state law “a formality”.  See 1 plus 1 not equal to 2.

The net effect is that the city slipped through the $450 thousand and spent a total over $1 million through a buy board where schools in Houston get 4% of what we spend and local contractors do not get a chance to bid.

The contract was discussed in More of Our Money For Houston where city council awarded $4 million through the buy board, with 4% of that going to Houston.  I wrote at the time that I wondered why the amount was so large.

The El Paso Inc. cleared that up for us in its January 13, 2013 front page article.  It appears that the contractor will start next week doing work at the 811 Texas building.  Then on February 15 they are scheduled to start work on the first floor of the El Paso Times building, all this through the Houston buy board.

Remember that on September 18, 2012 the citys Chief Financial Officer told the city council that the improvements needed at the Times building were “Minimal due to condition of the building”.  We now know of at least three separate job orders that must have been issued through this buy board on this building that we were told to buy.

The El Paso Inc. article also mentions that the city plans to house council chambers on the first floor.  Previously we had been led to believe that council would meet in the main library for a while.  Maybe that is still the case.  In City Council Chambers the cost to build new council chambers was identified as $800,000 from a city slide presentation.

So what does this add up to?  So far:

  • $450,000 to demolish the second floor improvements
  • $649,000 to build new offices on the second floor
  • Unknown amount (so much for open government) for work on the first floor
  • $800,000 or so for new city council chambers

That puts us at at least $1,899,000 and climbing.  The El Paso Inc. article puts the purchase price of the building at $9.4 million.  The Oxford Dictionaries defines minimal as “of a minimum amount, quantity, or degree; negligible”.  

Twenty percent is not negligible!

They have not been telling the truth.

We deserve better


City Manager’s Statement

December 19, 2012

Last Sunday (December 16, 2012) El Paso, Inc. published a public statement recently made by the city manager.

I don’t know whether to take it as an apology or as a promise to do better.  I hope that it is both but fear that it might be another exercise in misdirection and self justification.

Let me re-print the message as it was printed in the El Paso, Inc. and intersperse some of my thoughts in blue with the hope that the city manager will take them to heart.

I want to thank the mayor and City Council for their continuing vote of confidence and support.  I realize that the controversy surrounding the public release of volumes of emails has created an unfortunate distraction from the important work of the city and a regrettable conflict in relationships between myself and some members of City Council,  (The controversy did not cause the conflict.  You did.  You were wrong when you thought  it was your place to judge your bosses as having dementia.  You were wrong when you committed your thoughts to a written note to someone else.)  and the potential to permanently tarnish my career as city manager (your job, which is not a career, has been tarnished by this and other actions).

I once again want to publicly apologize for my role (not your role, you were not part of the problem, you and you alone  caused the problem) in causing this situation.  I am committed to doing my very best to rebuild those damaged relationships with the City Council and community (I hope that you will learn to put your obligations to the community first.) and to ensure that this conflict doesn’t adversely impact the community’s overall confidence in its city government (face it, it has) and the council/manager form of government in particular.

Even though all our actions surrounding the development of the ballpark project and related agreements were undertaken with only the community’s best interest at heart (thank you for your intent, but please understand that the community gets to decide what is in it’s best interest, not a city employee), the conflict surrounding these decisions did devolve into an erosion of civil discourse (it was not an “erosion” just because the discourse ran contrary to your actions) over a very important and transformative initiave, and I want to do my part to prevent a future reoccurence of same.

Of the many important lessons recently learned, all citizens are entitled to be heard and treated with respect as are all elected officials regardless of their respective positions on issues (I would have hoped that you knew this before taking the job.  The fact that you are just now learning it speaks volumes about your prior actions).  Process and relationships are equally important as results.  I am not the first person to make statements they regretted or which they could take back (Are you trying to say that since other people have made mistakes  that you are less accountable for yours?), or to not fully appreciate the impact of technology on communications (don’t you really mean that you did not realize the Public Information Act would allow someone to catch you?) and casual (casual?  It is not your place to gossip about and denegrate the people that you work for.) chatter.  I am not perfect, even though I recognize that I must be held to a higher standard because of the office I hold (If you had said “I am not perfect and I recognize…”  this would not have sounded like an excuse–are you saying “poor me, I have to be held to a higher standard”).

However, regardless of my personal failings (What are you saying here–you still think they are demented?), the public needs (deserves, not needs–you don’t get to decide what we need to do) to retain its confidence in the organization and leadership and know that this community and organization has been my passion and devotion (I thank you for that but would like to point out that your passions do not entitle you act differently from our will.) since taking office in 2004.

I am deeply saddened to have created a situation which compromised the city government reputation and for letting the mayor and council, the community and my staff down (good, but remember that the members of the community should come first in your thoughts).

2013 will be a year of significant change.  I am committed to providing appropriate stewardship and leadership (I just wish you knew what was appropriate.) going forward to ensure a smooth relocation of City Hall with minimal disruption in customer service, good oversight of the ballpark construction project, a seamless transition of a new mayor and council in June 2013 (What do you have to do with that?  Do you intend to tell us who to vote for?  I hope that you meant to say that you would do what you could to support the new officials.) , which is only six months away, and then a thorough process to recruit my successor (Please stop right there–you should have nothing to do with picking your successor other than answering those questions that the selection group poses.) so there will be no major upheaval or loss of continuity for the future (Who are you to decide about continuity?  Maybe the voters  want an upheaval.)

We also need to successfully launch the quality of life bond initiatives.  The community gave us a huge vote of confidence (That is presumptuous.  Some of us voted for the facilities despite our current government.) on election night and we need to make sure that this present conflict doesn’t undermine this extraordinary movement in El Paso’s history (How are you going to do that?  Silence the opposition?  I suggest that you administer our affairs in a professional manner).

I would like to again reaffirm my gratitude to the mayor and council for your continued support, and in particular to the mayor for the manner in which he constructively handled  (By prohibiting public comment from an elected official?) this situation and review.  Thank you.

Time will tell.  It is not too late for the city manager to start running an open, transparent government that responds to the will of the people.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.


Watsagoinon in ELP

December 10, 2012

Let me tell you, Brutus has been a busy man. Earlier this week he was spotted at Home Depot and Lowe’s pricing of all thing, ceiling tiles. Later, he was spotted driving up and down Durango and Santa Fe avenues. He does his homework, you betcha.

Rep Ortega joined the City mangler in referring to the voters (nebobs of negativism, I guess) in addition to crazies, as amateurs. He tossed his bagel into the voters rings hoping to be our next Mayor. Never practised law (or baked), so he needs a job. Speaking of Bagels, we have real Bagelman, Robert Cormell entering the race. A real working man who has successfully managed 3 shops without using East River water for the Bagels (New Yorker say.. aw fowgetaboutit). I guess the Dementia getting the best of me.

Speaking of Dementia, our Westside Rep in an EPT Editorial, did her thing about the Chucoleaks and the Emails that were uncovered. Can you imagine any pol not knowing that these thing are public property? Even the Chicago Pols figured that out. Well, in either case she praised the City Mangler for calling her Demented. I think that what she said. Stephanie, you better stop with the Emails.

Now getting back to what I originally wanted to say before I freely associated. “Anonymous” comments about the Canutillo School Board on 12/08/12 are very revealing. He puts a lot of loose ends together in his explanation of their actions. Not much to add. That’s investigative reporting. Crowder, someones stealing your thunder.

This is an Open Forum and we want your comments. Don’t let Brutus steal the tiles, or the street signs. Put your 3 cents in. Just leave me alone. I’m very sensitive.

Arcus Senilis