I was disappointed to read the article in the Times the other day about our former commanding general of Fort Bliss being accused of wrong-doing in a purchasing process.
We do not know what he did or did not do. We do know that the Times, through reference to a Washington Post article, told us:
Pittard was not accused of financial gain but was reprimanded by the Army for his “excessive involvement” in awarding the $492,000 contract and for “creating a perception of preferential treatment,” the Post reports.
Further from the Times article:
An Army review board is also considering whether to strip Pittard of his rank as a two-star general before he is allowed to retire later this year, according to the story posted online Sunday.
Perception
We should compare that to what is going on in El Paso. We have seen time and time again that not only is there a perception of preferential treatment, there is in fact preferential treatment.
The difference is that here in El Paso we tolerate it and whenever someone raises an objection the various local government officials circle the wagons to protect the culprits. Vendors that file open records requests are considered to be the enemy. Major contracts are cancelled and awarded to cronies. The public loses.
We deserve better
Brutus
Posted by Brutus 


You must be logged in to post a comment.