Why get personal?

May 16, 2017

The Times published an article the other day that told us that a grocery store had fired its manager.

The article indicated that the Times does not know why the manager was fired.

Unfortunately the article named the individual.

Was that necessary?

It seems that the store’s sales have not met expectations.  That might be news to some but most of us already knew about the issue.

We deserve better

Brutus


Unnecessary secrets

May 15, 2017

Just because we might have the right to do something that does not necessarily mean that we should do it.

Texas law allows city council to go into executive session when it seeks the advice of its attorney about pending or contemplated litigation.

According to their agenda for Tuesday, May 16, 2017 council plans to go into executive session to discuss possible litigation to oppose Texas senate bill 4.  The bill would punish local governments that prohibit law enforcement personnel from asking people that they detain  about the detainee’s immigration status.

According to a Times article:

City Attorney Sylvia Borunda Firth said during the discussion, posted on the city’s executive session agenda, she will explain the legal implications of the law and share information on current litigation across the state.

Why should this be secret?

The city is being asked to join a lawsuit that opposes senate bill 4, so it is true that litigation might be considered.

There are no circumstances about a particular party that need to be confidential here.  The city is not being sued by someone.  The city is not in a dispute where it is trying to recover money or property.

The discussion is about policy and whether or not to spend money to object to the new state law.

We should be able to hear what the city attorney and the  people at the meeting have to say.

We deserve better

Brutus

 


Times picks its words

May 14, 2017

Wouldn’t it have been more clear for the Times to have written “A chartered school bus”?

We deserve better

Brutus


EPISD–summer program

May 13, 2017

This came in from Dan Wever:

When the EPISD Trustees have their Board Meetings the Agenda usually includes a “Consent Agenda.” This Consent agenda has items in it that many times the President of the Board and Superintendent who together make up the Board packet, put items that they do not really want to be brought before the public and discussed. Of course, any Trustee can ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the regular agenda and discussed. At the April 18th Board meeting, a motion was made to approve the Consent Agenda as written and passed unanimously. This Consent Agenda had a few things in it that I believe the public would have had a great interest in and many questions should have been asked. Let me address the first one.
Purchases Requiring Board Approval

1. Purchase Appleton Summer Labs Learning Program Utilizing ESC Region 19 Allied States Cooperative Contract RFP #16-7200, Consulting, Staff Development and Related – (Budgeted State, Local and Federal Funds – $1,512,000.00)
(Summer Labs functions as a true extension of the school year by engaging students in a variety of educational experiences: application, reinforcement, and extension of skills and concepts taught during the school year; hands-on investigation of STEAM [Science, Technology, Engineering Arts, and Math] concepts; and the development of students’ communication, problem-solving, and teamwork skills)
Information of what this company (Appleton Learning) is going to do below. 
https://v3.boardbook.org/Public/PublicItemDownload.aspx…
Information on Bid and Appleton Learning Summer Lab Program in EPISD material below. 

You will need to check out these two links as there is just too much information for me to put it all in this post. If we just limit our looking at information that was and is available on the EPISD website and was available in the board packet that all the trustees have at board meetings See if any of this information would have caused you to ask more questions if you had been aware of this Request for Proposal.
I was impressed that during this Summer Labs program “Students become experts on the theme of each week-long STEAM module as they deepen their knowledge through inquiry-based learning and interactive experimentation.” The Backup says that the Program operation timeline is from July 17-28, 2017. I hope we did not pay 1.5 million dollars for 11 days! Prior to this 11-day timeline, Appleton will set up and configure the childcare management software, which includes setting up all user accounts for program management staff and register students for student learning. Appleton will also MARKET their Summer School program to Students and their parents. ARE PARENTS AND STUDENTS BEING CHARGED TO GO TO THESE SCHOOLS? Appleton will hire and train EPISD teachers and other personnel on program management and implementation. The proposed costs of this Summer Labs Program is listed as follows. Notice the Administrative fees are 66% of what the Labor costs are supposed to be.

In the material presented in the EPISD board material by Appleton Learning, there are two options given. One of them pays teachers $35 per hour and the other which the figures below represent and were printed in the acceptance material show the teachers being paid $12 an hour.

Labor costs—————— —– $706,505.66
Administrative fees————- $467,586.72
Profits —————————— $151,200.00
Field Trips ————— ———- $58,800.00
Materials and Curriculum —– $124,980.00
Marketing——————— —— $2,927.60
Total Cost————————-$1,511,999.98

Just the information that was available during and before the EPISD board meeting should have raised enough questions to have a special board meeting, but not a question was asked by this RUBBER STAMP BOARD.

This whole deal looks more like a childcare exercise that anything to help our struggling students in summer school.

As you get away from the information available on EPISD web and go to Appleton Learning web and look at their programs you will find their Summer Labs program and it has many things that would be offensive to El Paso parents.

Example: If students are picked-up from Summer Labs after 12:15 PM (for students enrolled in the half-day morning program) and 6:00 PM (for students enrolled in the full day and half-day afternoon programs), then a late pick-up fee will be added to the account balance. At 12:16 PM and 6:01 PM, a $10 late pick-up fee will be added to the account balance. For every minute after 12:16 PM and 6:01 PM, an additional $1 late pick-up fee will be added to the account balance.

Also, this company handles all payroll and benefits of any employees

So, in conclusion, we are turning over 14 of our schools to a private company that has sold 6 franchises in Houston Texas and are paying them 1.5 million dollars to teach x number of students in their summer school program.
 
Is this why our board policies on school use were all changed recently to accommodate this company?

I think some questions should have been asked by Trustees!

Bound to fail

May 12, 2017

According to the Times a lawsuit has been filed claiming that Texas state senate bill 4 violates the 10th amendment to the United States constitution.

It makes sense that some groups are opposed to bill.  What would make even more sense is if they based their objections on an argument that they can win.

The wording of the 10th is:

The powers not delegated to the United States  by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Evidently one of the statements in the lawsuit is “SB4 supports otherwise to wrest this autonomy from local governments…”.

The 10th does not address the autonomy of local governments.  That is done in our state constitution.

Our state government has powers over our local governments just as our feral government has powers over the various states.

The lawsuit is basically asking a court to declare that state governments have no power over local ones.  Chaos would be the result if that were to happen.

The Times did not mention this.  Maybe everyone involved should read our constitution.

We deserve better

Brutus