EPISD bonds–another view

October 29, 2016
Xavier Miranda sent this in:
*****************************************************
As an educator in the El Paso Independent School District, I acknowledge the need to address the long-neglected condition of our schools, and the need to add facilities to accommodate for students enrolled in Fine Arts and athletic programs.
However, the notion that buildings and technology are answers to improve educational outcomes dismisses the role of educators. Technology does not provide the necessary encouragement to a student who comes from a home whose parent has to work two jobs to make ends meet. A new building does not provide inspiration to a student who goes to bed hungry. The closure of neighborhood schools dismisses the concepts of child behavior development, and the sense of community. Pedagogical considerations are a forgone conclusion.
The vilification of our education system is a strategy utilized by special interest groups to de-fund public education, promote test-centered curriculum, and further widen the economic gap between the wealthy and poor.
Realizing that early voting is scheduled to start on October 25, it is necessary to provide the following information that may assist in determining whether to support or oppose the $668.7 million EPISD Bond.
The following links provide insight to some private interests that have funded the El Paso Rising political action committee, that may profit from the passage of the bond, whether through construction or financial consulting services:
A significant contributor to the El Paso Rising political action committee is Dee Margo. He is a former Texas State Representative whose legislative record includes the cutting of the Texas education budget to the tune of $5.4 billion in 2011. He then later served as a member of the EPISD Board of Managers, of whom initially authorized the Jacobs Engineering study, currently used to close and consolidate schools included in this EPISD bond.
The campaign finance reports, include folks who have contributed significant amounts of money to Texans for Education Reform, an organization seeking to dismantle public education, through the promotion of vouchers and charter schools.
A prevalent concern expressed in our community is the issue of trust. A way to restore it, would be the commitment by district officials to re-locate administrative operations to one of the schools proposed for closure, or to the portable classrooms in which our students are currently housed. Given the City of El Paso’s non-renewal of the lease for the administrative offices on Boeing, this would certainly be a tangible action. 
Please consider the education of our children and authentically engage in advocacy efforts.
Best Regards,
Xavier Miranda
El Paso Grassroots

EPISD bonds–post from Ms. Fenenbock

October 28, 2016

EPISD bonds–K-8 instead of separate middle schools

October 27, 2016

This was part of a note from Dan Wever about the school closings:

Somebody just wants to go back to the K-8 format and is willing to pay over 200 million dollars of EPISD taxpayer money to get their wish.

You can look at the Maintenance costs and they show it is not costing what they say it is costing.

Attached was a spreadsheet that broke out various costs of operating many of the schools.

We deserve better

Brutus


EPISD bonds–superintendent

October 26, 2016

We recently heard a rumor that the superintendent has told some of his principals that it’s their bond issue–he won’t be around to see it through.

Can any of our readers confirm this, or is it just an attempt to discredit the bond process?

We deserve better

Brutus


EPISD bonds–pay raises on the never never

October 25, 2016

The EPISD teachers have been led to believe that the nine million dollars per year of savings that might result from spending 670 million dollars will be given to them in the form of raises.  The premise is absurd.  Spending $670 million will cost money, not save money.

What we have not heard a lot about is how long it will be before the savings are realized, if ever.

Architects will have to be hired.  Schools will have to be designed and then built.  Most of the construction will be on existing campuses with students present.  How long will that take?

Will any of the current school board members still be around if they ever finish the projects?  Will future boards honor the current commitment?

We deserve better

Brutus