Impossible barrier to recruitment

June 24, 2016

The 2015 property tax comparison study is out from the Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence.

For the 2013 year the group placed us as having the 7th highest residential property tax rate of the 50 largest American cities.

The 2014 report put us as the 5th highest.

Hard work will get you to the top

The 2015 report shows us steadily deteriorating with a ranking of having the 3rd highest property tax rates for homestead  homeowners among America’s largest cities.

2015taxrate

In 2014 we wrote Hidden taxes and showed that the city was billing us another $116 million or so in “fees”, some of which used to be paid for with property taxes.  Our real tax rate is even higher than what the report shows.

Continuing with the awful news, the 2015 report indicates that El Paso has the second highest industrial property tax rate for small facilities and the third highest for large ones.

How can we expect businesses to move here with a situation like this?

We deserve better

Brutus


Those pesky rules

June 21, 2016

The Times published “EPISD audit pinpoints hiring flaws” the other day.

The audit was one performed by EPISD staff and was published earlier this year.  The problems “can be fixed with additional staff training, as well as updating and formalizing hiring procedures, according to the audit report, released earlier this spring.”

Not really

We can probably all agree that fixing the procedures is something that EPISD should do.

The problems won’t be fixed however until management at the district starts to follow the rules and respects the fact that they are public servants and not above the rules.

Their recent shenanigans with upper level jobs occurred after the audit was published.  It seems they just chose to ignore it.

The board needs to step in here.

We deserve better

Brutus

 


Good reporting

June 20, 2016

Something good happened at the Times the other day.

Lindsey Anderson wrote a headline article about two former EPISD administrators.

Her article was thorough and balanced.

She told us that they each pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States.

We were informed that they are to be sentenced a month after the trial of six other ex-administrators begins and that they could receive lighter sentences if they give “substantial assistance” to law enforcement and prosecutors.

I wonder what would happen to one of the other six if they offered something for giving “substantial assistance” at trial to one of the two that has pled guilty.

We deserve better

Brutus


Good signs from EPISD

June 16, 2016

Dori Fenenbock, the president of the EPISD board looked into Dan Wever’s post Making money from the district and was kind enough to send us this statement that she had received from a senior administrator:

“The Teacher and Principal Insight “Talent Predictors” have not been used for almost 3years.”

It looks like the new team is cleaning some things up.

Our thanks to Mrs. Fenenbock.

Brutus

Making money from the district

June 14, 2016
Dan Wever wrote to tell us that he sent this letter to the EPISD board almost a year ago.
He says that he never received a response.
Board of Managers,
Are you aware of the TeacherInsight product sold by Gallup?  This a product that is touted by Gallup, if used, will raise you TAKS and STARS test scores by hiring teachers that can score well on this instrument.
Gallup says they tested 400 of the best teachers in the United States and their answers were made the passing or acceptable score on this test.  There are no right or wrong answers and it is a basic personality psychology test.  Their claim says that all good teachers have the same habits, likes, dislikes, goals and motivation and they claim that their test can pinpoint these teachers from groups applying for jobs in school districts.
Of course Gallup has all kinds of data and results that look great until you realize that it is all coming from the people trying to sell this program to districts that will buy anything that purports to raise test scores.
I have been studying this test for about 3 weeks and can find no study that agrees with Gallup.  One of the non-Gallup studies had 12 questions they asked about it.  The answers to 11 of the questions said there was no statistical difference or increase in test scores.  The lone possible positive was so small it was insignificant.
I will attach the study from Colorado since you are from there.
Of course when the EPISD got hold of this idea it was embraced like a lost love.  We now have people applying for jobs in the EPISD and the first thing they have to do is take this test.  They can be Federal Master Teachers from another state or new UTEP education graduates that have passed all their state certification and are ready to begin their careers.  Well in the EPISD if you don’t score high enough on this test you will not even get an interview for a position.  And here is the real kicker.
As you know the state legislatures gave the principals of schools the power to hire and fire so to speak because in their wisdom they realized that the Central Office was doing to much in this area and the Central office help was usually not even qualified to make hiring decisions of teachers as many times like the present  head of HR, does not have an educational background.
The Garcia syndrome mandated that he or his people have their finger on every pulse in the district and they need to be able to control the medication if needed.
The trustees have a policy that spells out how the hiring process is to be handled and there is nothing about mandatory TeacherInsight scores.  I will also attach Bulletin 44 that shows you what a principal must go through if they want to hire someone who did not make the grade on this test.  HR jumps the Principals through hoops and has taken their power away from them.  Of course the Principals do not complain because they are still in the Garcia mindset mode and probably don’t even know what they are supposed to be able to do by law.
So what has happened in the EPISD is the Principals have lost the powers that the State legislature wanted them to have and put into law.
A side point on all of this is of course the HR department can determine the scores and thus pick the people (friends and family) will get first shot at any openings.  I know you probably do not think this happens but, if it does not, it is the only thing working in the EPISD.
A friend of mine was on a committee to hire a new teacher and they interviewed 2 applicants, one of them was outstanding and everyone on the committee said to hire her, when the principal gave her choice she was notified the one that everyone liked had not done well on the TeacherInsight test and they were forced to take the one that did well.  It has turned out according to my friend that the teacher they were forced to hire turned out to be a dud.
I think the EPISD wants all of their teachers to be made out of tickey tackey and to all look just the same.  We are destroying the diversification, which is good,  in our teachers (which in my opinion trying to get them to all like and act the same way.}
The EPISD has had this TeacherInsight test since 2007, and have even included a PrincipalInsight to help them find Principals,  and there are several places in Agenda items and school improvement documents where the board of trustees has been promised  EPISD data that shows the program from Gallup is worth the money.  The report has never come and with all the cheating I don’t think they could make any correlation to improved TAKS or STARS test scores because of lit use.  It is a waste of money and you can find no studies from anyone other than Gallup that says it does anything to help education.
By the way the EPISD has spent $236,261.41 since 2007 on these tests.
I hope we can get somebody to look at this program before it comes before the board again and is bought again as of course a sole source item.